Our Spanish language podcast: Justicia ImPositiva, Edición 1

Taxcast logo SpanishJusticia ImPositiva, Edición 1 del nuevo podcast de Tax Justice Network/Red de Justicia Fiscal

En este mes de agosto 2015: desvelamos las estrategias de los países poderosos para continuar manteniendo un sistema tributario que beneficie a las grandes corporaciones. ¿Sabías que al menos 26 bancos europeos transfieren sus beneficios a paraísos fiscales a través de sus sucursales? ¿Funcionara la nueva amnistía fiscal de Brasil? ¿Y sabias de la gran empresa minera que dejó de pagar 1,082 millones de dólares en impuestos en Perú? Hablamos con los analistas y expertos, Markus Meinzer, director del Índice de Opacidad Financiera de Tax Justice Network (Red de Justicia Fiscal) y John Christensen, director general de esta organización. Y en la última sección, abordamos los conceptos básicos del campo de la tributación con los especialistas Jorge Gaggero, miembro de la Red de Justicia Fiscal de América Latina y el Caribe e investigador del Centro de Economía y Finanzas para el desarrollo de Argentina- CEFID-AR y Corina Mora, responsable de comunicación e incidencia de la organización InspirAction. Bienvenid@s a este nuevo podcast @J_ImPositiva con @silvia1olmedo y @MonicaMarchesi coordinado por @Naomi_Fowler para @TaxJusticeNet

Jersey court may be ready to consider tax matters in future trust rulings

Bailhache: acknowledging the unethical side of tax avoidance

Bailhache: “strong ethical arguments”

A recent judgement on an application to rectify a Jersey trust suggests that the Royal Court of Jersey may in future take account of whether a trust is being used for tax avoidance.  Remarks by the island’s Bailiff (high court judge) William Bailhache are being interpreted by some Jersey lawyers as an indication that the Court might take the tax consequences and intentions of a trust scheme into account when considering future cases.

Commenting on the case of IFM Corporate Trustees (2015 JRC 160), Bailhache noted:

“The court was initially concerned that this particular scheme might have fallen into the category of aggressive tax avoidance. . . If that were so, [it] might therefore have been the sort of scheme where in the exercise of its discretion, the court should consider whether such a fact, if true, should lead to the refusal to exercise discretion in favour of the applicant.”

In the case of IFM Corporate Trustees the Court accepted that the tax planning did not constitute unacceptable tax avoidance, but in a remark that might send shivers up the backs of tax professionals on the wilder fringe, Bailhache noted
“Historically, the courts have always applied the principles of law rather than what are perhaps inchoate and uncertain ethical considerations in this area.  What seems to us perhaps to be open to argument is whether, in an area which involves the exercise of a judicial discretion in cases where the court’s assistance is being sought for a mistake which has been made, there is room for the argument that the discretion ought not to be exercised if on the facts of a particular case, the scheme in question is lawful but appears to be so contrived and artificial that it leaves the Court with distaste if, in effect, it is required to endorse it. ”  (our emphasis added)

This remark is potentially of seismic importance, since the tax intentions of trusts have not previously been considered relevant to cases where the Jersey Court has been asked to exercise its discretion to rectify a trust.  According to one Jersey law firm, Bailhache’s remark opens the way for the Court to take account of whether or not a trust might serve as a tax avoidance vehicle:

“Potentially, any application to the court involving its discretion […] may require the tax consequences and intentions of the scheme to be aired and subjected to a wider debate whether the court should go along with them.”

Nodding in the direction of the global tax justice movement, Jersey’s Bailiff also acknowledged the ethical implications of tax avoidance, noting the

“strong ethical arguments why taxpayers should recognise their obligations to the state in which they live, making their fair and appropriate contribution towards the outgoings which any modern state has in the provision of services for the benefit of the community.”

Who could reasonably disagree with that?

Read the Royal Court judgement here

 

The West African Tax Giveaway: new report

The ECOWAS headquarters in Abuja, Nigeria

The ECOWAS headquarters in Abuja, Nigeria

An important joint report has been published by TJN-Africa and Actionaid looking at corporate tax incentives and their impact in the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) — and in particular Nigeria, Ghana, Cote d’Ivoire and Senegal.

The report’s first finding is that:

I. Corporate tax incentives – reductions in tax offered by governments presumably to attract investment – significantly reduce domestic revenue collection and are not necessary to attract foreign direct investment (FDI).

Continue reading “The West African Tax Giveaway: new report”

The Tax Justice Network podcast, August 2015

In the August 2015 Tax Justice Network Podcast: Sun, sea and tax: the Taxcast goes to Mexico and looks at how multinational tourism operates there. Plus: we ask why Luxembourg is printing euros like there’s no tomorrow; whether Brazil’s offer of a tax amnesty to its tax dodgers will work; and how much longer ‘emerging economies’ and other countries left out of the reform of global tax rules will put up with it. Continue reading “The Tax Justice Network podcast, August 2015”

New publication: The Greatest Invention – Tax and the Campaign for a Just Society

Available 24th September 2015

Available 24th September 2015

Available Worldwide, September 24, 2015 

The Greatest Invention: Tax and the Campaign for a Just Society

Continue reading “New publication: The Greatest Invention – Tax and the Campaign for a Just Society”

Islands (the play): the conversation shifts

From the subtitle of an article in The UK’s Guardian newspaper by Caroline Horton about her play Islands, a dark skewering of tax havens which has been significantly inspired by by TJN’s work.

“The appalling reviews for our show about tax havens led me to wonder if I’d ever work again. But then the conversation shifted.”

Continue reading “Islands (the play): the conversation shifts”

Guest post: time for a grown-up debate about corporate welfare

A guest post by Kevin Farnsworth, Senior Lecturer in Social Policy at the University of York. He recently published work on corporate welfare in the UK, which attracted a lot of attention (and some criticism.) Here is his response, which was originally posted at Speri, and is cross-posted here, with thanks.

Kevin Farnsworth

Kevin Farnsworth

The purpose of my report into, British corporate welfare, which featured in the,Guardian on Budget day, was to bring corporate welfare into the debate about the future shape of the state. The report raises questions about the role of the government in meeting, balancing and managing the needs and interests of businesses alongside those of citizens. In this respect it succeeded. But only up to a point. The noise surrounding the discussion of the size of corporate welfare got in the way of debate. Meanwhile, George Osborne’s budget made the strongest argument yet for such a debate on corporate welfare and its role and purpose within the shrinking state. Continue reading “Guest post: time for a grown-up debate about corporate welfare”

Coming soon: the first Spanish language Taxcast

We generally don’t post non-English language articles, but this is a flyer for the launch of TJN’s first Spanish-language Taxcast, so we’ll break with tradition for this blog. An English translation is below, in any case.

Taxcast logo SpanishNuevo: Tax Justice Network (Red de Justicia Fiscal) podcast en Castellano, por favor difundir a través de todas tus redes.

Nuestro podcast mensual en Inglés “The Taxcast”, ya tiene 4 años y es transmitido y descargado en 130 naciones. Ahora queremos tu ayuda para tener un seguimiento similar para nuestro nuevo podcast en Español “Justicia Impositiva”, enfocado para todos los ciudadanos de España y Latinoamerica.

Justicia ImPositiva es un programa de 15 minutos que ofrece un análisis único sobre la justicia fiscal y la corrupción financiera. Producido por las periodistas Mónica Marchesi de Venezuela y Silvia Olmedo de España, y coordinado por la productora de @TheTaxcast @Naomi_Fowler. El primer programa se emitirá en agosto. 

Por favor apoyanos siguiendonos y compartiendo esto extensamente:

Puedes encontrarnos cada mes en youtube: http://bit.ly/1E4vV45

Twitter: @j_impositiva

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Justicia-ImPositiva/1464800660510982

Para más información o suscribirte:

Justicia ImPositiva: [email protected]

Mónica Marchesi: [email protected]

Silvia Olmedo: [email protected]

New: Spanish Tax Justice Network podcast: please spread across all your networks

Our monthly podcast in English, the Taxcast, is now in its 4th year and is broadcast and downloaded in over 130 nations. Now we want your help in getting a similar popular following for our brand new monthly podcast in Spanish called Justicia ImPositiva, aimed at Spanish and Latin American citizens. Justicia ImPositiva is a 15 minute programme which will provide unique analysis on tax justice and financial corruption, produced by journalists Mónica Marchesi from Venezuela and Silvia Olmedo from Spain, coordinated by @TheTaxcast producer @Naomi_Fowler. The very first show will be out in August.

Please support us by following us and sharing widely:

You can find us every month on youtube: http://bit.ly/1E4vV45

Twitter: @j_impositiva

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Justicia-ImPositiva/1464800660510982 

For futher information or to subscribe:

Justicia ImPositiva: [email protected]

Mónica Marchesi: [email protected]

Silvia Olmedo: [email protected]

Naomi Fowler

@Naomi_Fowler

Taxcast Producer

Tax Justice Network

www.taxjustice.net/taxcast

www.tackletaxhavens.com/taxcast

The ALEC rankings: does smaller government mean higher growth?

This post originally appeared at Fools’ Gold, a TJN-supported site about “competitiveness”.

There are a lot of ‘competitiveness’-related rankings of countries and states out there, from the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report, to the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business rankings. (We’ll address some of these in due course.) It’s interesting to note, for starters, that the highly taxed, highly regulated Scandinavian economies seem to do just as well as their low-tax, lightly regulated peers. Recently we made up a little graph to illustrate this, looking at the WEF’s ranking:

Source: WEF, Conference board. The sample of countries included those with comparable levels of GDP per capita, and excluding micro-states which often have their own ‘tax haven’ growth dynamics. The cut-off was to use states with GDP per capita (PPP) of above $20,000 on average from 1989-2013. Source: Conference Board data tables.

Source: World Economic Forum, Conference Board. The sample of countries included those with comparable levels of GDP per capita, and excluding micro-states which often have their own ‘tax haven’ growth dynamics. We used states with GDP per capita (PPP) of above $20,000 on average from 1989-2013. Source: Conference Board data tables.

There’s no obvious trend here, is there? The high-tax countries seem to be just as ‘competitive’ as the low-tax ones, it seems, even on the WEF’s measures, (which are somewhat skewed toward the low-tax, light regulation model.) The non-trend you see in this graph is just as Martin Wolf, Paul Krugman and various others would have predicted.

Continue reading “The ALEC rankings: does smaller government mean higher growth?”

Tracking corporate tax breaks: a welcome new form of transparency emerges in the U.S.

Cross-posted with Fools’ Gold:

Across the world, corporations are showered with tax breaks and other inducements in the name of ‘competitiveness.’ In most cases these tax breaks don’t affect investment decisions in any way. They are pure giveaways. In many countries it’s been hard to track the scale and extent of these giveaways, although recently we reported on one such effort by Kevin Farnsworth in the UK, which noted that the race to the bottom between nations and states on tax and corporate subsidies doesn’t stop at zero: it just keeps heading on downwards.

In the United States there has been some very good work done by nonprofit groups, notably Good Jobs First, to expose what’s been going on. (Greg Leroy, Director of Good Jobs First, attended the Fools’ Gold inaugural meeting in Warwick, UK, in February this year.

Now they report in a press release on an excellent development – a form of transparency that’s recommended for all countries. Continue reading “Tracking corporate tax breaks: a welcome new form of transparency emerges in the U.S.”

Quote of the day – Mariana Mazzucato

Here’s our quote of the day, from Mariana Mazzucato, via the Financial Times:

“Businesses invest only where they really see future technological and market opportunities. If you bring their tax to zero, you’ve just made them richer, they will golf more. They will not invest.”

Read more here.

 

 

 

UK Prime Minister Cameron told: stop Jersey-registered shell company suing Romania in ‘corporate court’

Rosia Montana gold mine uses the gold cyanidation technique

Rosia Montana gold mine uses the gold cyanidation technique

A letter (see below) to the UK prime minister signed by TJN and other global justice campaign organisations, calls on David Cameron to stop a Canadian mining company using a Jersey ‘subsidiary’ to sue Romania for halting toxic gold mine, and warns that such cases will balloon under the proposed TransAtlantic Trade and Investment Partnership.

Continue reading “UK Prime Minister Cameron told: stop Jersey-registered shell company suing Romania in ‘corporate court’”

Is it time to assess the financial secrecy of the Vatican?

A bastion of opacity; the IOR in Rome

A bastion of opacity; the IOR in Rome – photo: John Christensen

The Vatican-based  Istituto per le Opere di Religione (the Institute for Religious Works or IOR, a.k.a. the Vatican Bank) probably falls into the category of the world’s most controversial bank. Now, according to this long read article in today’s Guardian, the bank’s unaccountable bureaucracy and self-serving networks who have operated with impunity for decades, faces a vigourous shakedown led by Pope Francis himself.

Created in the late 19th century, prior to which the Vatican’s wealth was apparently stored in a coffer under Pope Leo’s bed – the bank has been implicated in numerous scandals, including handling Nazi assets, acting as a conduit for covert funding of Cold War counter-insurgency programmes, plus, of course, the infamous dealings with the Banco Ambrosiano, made famous by the third of the Godfather film trilogy.

With so many of its transactions conducted using cash, and with such a strong veil of secrecy surrounding its activities, the IOR became notorious for money-laundering, with many commentators (including this blogger) arguing that the Vatican was itself a tax haven.  As Paul Vallely argues in the Guardian:

“The Vatican was a natural tax haven. It was an offshore bank in the middle of Rome that Italians could enter merely by waiting for the traffic lights to change from red to green. In line with the Roman Catholic church’s traditional aversion to transparency, the bank authorities adamantly refused to cooperate with the Bank of Italy’s investigation.”

Pope Francis’ mission is to radically break from that past.  He has appointed Australian Cardinal George Pell to lead the transformation of the IOR into a modern, transparent financial management service that elevates the churches’ mission to help the poor to top priority.  According to Vallely:

“Francis told his financier advisers at their first meeting in July 2013 that “sound financial management was a pillar of his greatest mission: aiding the poor and underprivileged”. What that meant, said Cardinal Pell, is that “the Pope wants to maximise the amount of money coming in so that it could be spent on the poor and the works of the church. Because we’re trying to help people is no reason why we should be inefficient, or not transparent, or open to being robbed.”

Bold sentiments, and who would not want Cardinal Pell to succeed with his task?  And one way of checking his progress might be for the Vatican to agree to being assessed under TJN’s Financial Secrecy Index, which cuts through the fine words and perceptions looking instead at legal fact and published international assessments.  If the Vatican can achieve a secrecy score better than forty it will compare favourably with most other countries.  How about it, Cardinal Pell?

Read the full Guardian article here.

 

 

The Heavens: a photographic exploration of tax havens

 A man floats in the 57th-floor infinity pool  with the skyline of Singapore’s financial district behind him.  Photo: Paolo Woods and Gabriele Galimberti


A man floats in a 57th-floor infinity pool above the skyline of Singapore’s financial district.
Photo: Paolo Woods and Gabriele Galimberti

In his essay on what he termed ‘Conspicuous Leisure’, economist Thorstein Veblen observed that “In order to gain and hold the esteem of men it is not sufficient merely to possess wealth or power.  The wealth or power must be put to evidence, for esteem is only awarded on evidence. And not only does the evidence of wealth serve to impress one’s importance on others and to keep their sense of his importance alive and alert, but it is scarcely less use in building up and preserving one’s self-complacency.” Continue reading “The Heavens: a photographic exploration of tax havens”

Who are the real “marauders”?

SCN_0009

ma+raud verb. to search (a place) for plunder

On Monday this week the Guardian newspaper splashed a headline across its frontpage about a comment from UK minister of foreign affairs Philip Hammond accusing “marauding migrants” of threatening the standard of living of Europeans.  Continue reading “Who are the real “marauders”?”

The power of corporate propaganda: review of ‘The Mythology of Business’

ISBN no. 978-1-906703-27-1 Published July 2015

ISBN no. 978-1-906703-27-1
Published July 2015

Why did the vibrant social democratic traditions of Europe and North America collapse so swiftly in the face of the pervasive propaganda of the neoliberal project? Continue reading “The power of corporate propaganda: review of ‘The Mythology of Business’”

Women’s Working Group reaction to the Addis Ababa finance for development outcomes

From the Women’s Working Group on Financing for Development

Reaction to the Outcome Document of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development: Addis Ababa Action Agenda

July 2015

Download PDF

The Women’s Working Group on Financing for Development (WWG on FfD) expresses its strong disappointment with the Addis Ababa Action Agenda adopted at the conclusion of the Third Financing for Development Conference that took place in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 13 to 16 July 2015. Continue reading “Women’s Working Group reaction to the Addis Ababa finance for development outcomes”

No country for dirty money: behind Britain’s populist promise on corruption

xThis guest blog by Jörg Wiegratz was originally published by The Conversation, and is re-published here with the author’s permission

The contemporary global economy is characterised by high levels of corruption and crime. Economic chicanery and fraud are rife in many business sectors Continue reading “No country for dirty money: behind Britain’s populist promise on corruption”

The Amartya Sen Prize Contest for New Work on Tax Justice

Academics Stand Against Poverty, the Yale Global Justice Program, and Global Financial Integrity invite submissions of original essays of ca. 7,000 to 9,000 words on the intelligent use of incentives toward curtailing corporations’ use of tax evasion and avoidance, abusive transfer pricing and all forms of illicit financial flows. All prizes are named in honor of Amartya Sen, whose work has shown how the rigor of economic thinking can be brought to bear on normative and practical questions of great human significance. For more details, please see the contest web page.

The best entries will be presented at an international conference in the fall of 2015 at Yale University and subsequently published in a special issue of a prominent journal. In addition, at least two of the winning essays will receive a monetary award: a first prize of $5,000 and a second prize of $3,000. Professor Sen joined us last year for the conference presentations and hopes to do so again this year.

Entries can be e-mailed to Chelsea Papa at [email protected] by September 11, 2015. We ask that entries be anonymized to facilitate blind refereeing. Winners will be selected by an expert jury, whose decisions are final.

Is it game over for money laundering in London’s property market?

Cross-posted from Finance: Uncovered

 

Today, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom announced that the UK will publish information on property owned by foreign companies.

In a speech in Singapore David Cameron said: “The UK must not become a safe haven for corrupt money from around the world”.

He has committed to starting a central register of land owned by overseas companies this autumn, and will be consulting on whether to introduce a register of beneficial ownership of land in the future.

 

Why is this important?

Put simply London property is the currency of corruption. According to London’s police force, most grand corruption cases they investigate involve the purchase of UK property. Continue reading “Is it game over for money laundering in London’s property market?”

Finance: Uncovered – financial investigative journalism training course

The Tax Justice Network and the Centre of Investigative Journalism are delighted to put out a call to journalists, campaigners and academics to attend our highly regarded five-day financial investigative journalism training course in London.

The dates for our next training will be: 16 November 2015 – 20 November 2015

Finance Uncovered (formerly known as the Illicit Finance Journalism Programme) equips journalists and researchers from all over the world with the skills to undertake tax abuse, money laundering and corruption investigations.

This course will also draw the links between tax justice and human rights. Continue reading “Finance: Uncovered – financial investigative journalism training course”

Will the patent box break BEPS?

By Alex Cobham, our research director: first posted at Uncounted.

The UK has successfully defended the ‘patent box’ against the charge that it is a major avenue for multinational corporate tax abuse. Now everybody wants one, even though the evidence suggests that only multinationals will benefit.

Will countries take the last chance for productive cooperation offered by BEPS; or will the patent box end up as the paradigmatic case of rich countries ‘competing’ themselves down (and taking developing countries with them)? Continue reading “Will the patent box break BEPS?”