Jersey: the fall of a Finance-Cursed tax haven

Jersey tide

Jersey at low tide. From The Heavens – the new tax haven photo book from Paolo Woods and Gabriele Galimberti theheavensllc.com

A new article in the Guardian Long Reads series, entitled The fall of Jersey: how a tax haven goes bust. (Not as dramatic as this one, but still.)

The article heavily features Jerseyman John Christensen, TJN’s Director (along with Richard Murphy of Tax Research UK, who has been influential in TJN’s history.)

Jersey’s financial sector has done very well out of offshore finance, for decades: but now there’s trouble at t’mill:

“In April, officials announced that the budget would be short £125m a year by 2019. “What went wrong?” asked the Jersey Evening Post. And that was just the start of it. By June, the annual deficit – now known on the island as the “black hole” – had been revised upwards to £145m, more than £1 in every five that the government spends. “The black hole is so big,” according to Connect, a Jersey business magazine, that “filling it will take the equivalent of shutting down every school in the island, laying off every teacher, letting the parks turn into overgrown jungles and having our roads literally fall apart.”

Continue reading “Jersey: the fall of a Finance-Cursed tax haven”

The chaser’s guide to tax havens: a simple 1,413-step guide

ChaserSome offshore humour for a Monday morning: The Chaser’s Guide to Tax Havens, from Australia. The magazine has an interesting history:

“Ever since The Chaser started, back in 1999, we have strived to build our company on a solid foundation of inexplicable and highly technical tax losses.”

Back to the guide to tax havens: perhaps our favourite section is this one – because it’s so appallingly true, from a tax cheater’s perspective:

Profits chaser

 

But Myth 1 is pretty good too. Another excerpt, among many: Continue reading “The chaser’s guide to tax havens: a simple 1,413-step guide”

COP21 – TJN statement to the Citizen’s Climate Summit in Paris

20151206_123950

TJN participated at the Citizen’s Climate Summit in Paris this weekend.  TJN’s director John Christensen spoke at a rally in Montreuil where this statement on financing the social and ecological transition was agreed by an assembly of 196 civil society representatives Continue reading “COP21 – TJN statement to the Citizen’s Climate Summit in Paris”

Quote of the day – on Mark Zuckerberg’s ‘charitable donation’

For those who don’t know, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg this week pledged, on the birth of his daughter, to donate 99 percent of his billion-worth of Facebook stock to good causes. Which has generated adulation and love, from around the world: just look at the Great and the Good lining up to applaud him on his Facebook page.

Our quote of the day comes from one absolute must-read article about Zuckerberg’s move:

“He amassed one of the greatest fortunes in the world — and is likely never to pay any taxes on it.”

Continue reading “Quote of the day – on Mark Zuckerberg’s ‘charitable donation’”

Workshop: Call for Papers on Corruption and the Role of Tax Havens

x

Call for papers for a Research Workshop on

CORRUPTION AND THE
ROLE OF TAX HAVENS Continue reading “Workshop: Call for Papers on Corruption and the Role of Tax Havens”

Shell companies: UK statement on public registers – and an animated video

A new announcement from the Joint Ministerial Council of the UK and its Overseas Territories – many of which are major global tax havens:

“We agreed to hold beneficial ownership information in our respective jurisdictions via central registers or similarly effective systems. We discussed the details of how these systems should be implemented, including through technical dialogue between the Overseas Territories and UK law enforcement authorities on further developing a timely, safe and secure information exchange process to increase our collective effectiveness for the purposes of law enforcement. We agreed that addressing this issue would be given the highest priority and that progress on implementation would be kept under continuous and close review.”

That is the ‘new’ position on public registers of beneficial ownership. It is a rather feeble, albeit positive, step: it is essential that these registers be made public, where proper and widespread use can be made by journalists, investors and many others.

For background, a new animated video from Global Witness:

In related news, from the same source:

Revealed: how Southeast Asia’s Biggest Drug Lord Used Shell Companies to become a Jade Kingpin

For an opposing view, see our old friend Anthony Travers, the chairman of the Cayman Islands stock exchange, as usual dripping contempt in our direction. Travers argues, as is customary, that Cayman is squeaky clean (it isn’t) but also points the finger at the awfulness of other jurisdictions, notably the United States.

On this latter point we’d fully agree with him: as we’ve already noted, the United States is an unreformed and very dangerous tax haven.

This is a very serious matter. And more on this subject soon.

 

 

 

French parliament approves public country-by-country-reporting

Updated with new analysis.

Update 2: on a third round, the proposal has failed in the national assembly. This is far from the end of it.

STOP PRESS:  We’ve just heard that the French National Assembly has voted in favour of public — yes, public — country-by-country reporting. As a member of Plateforme Paradis Fiscaux et Judiciaires (PPFJ,) a French partner network has noted, via email:

x

Continue reading “French parliament approves public country-by-country-reporting”

Three Tax Whistleblowers Who Changed The Game

Spot the tax haven (source: Senate Permanent Sub-Committee on Investigations)

Spot the tax haven (source: Senate Permanent Sub-Committee on Investigations)

The following blog was first published as part of a longer article in the Whistleblower Edition of Tax Justice Focus (available here).  The article was authored by Professor William Byrnes, Associate Dean (Special Projects) Texas A&M University Law.

A lawsuit filed by Daniel Schlicksup, a lesser acclaimed whistleblower, may end up costing Caterpillar billions of dollars and a criminal investigation because of its alleged non tax compliant transfer pricing policy. Mr. Schlicksup served as a global tax strategy manager for Caterpillar from 2005 to 2008. During his time at Caterpillar, Daniel Schlicksup assisted Caterpillar establish its European tax department, managed the corporate human resources division, and in March 2005, began working as a Global Tax Strategy Manager.

Mr. Schlicksup grew concerned that the substance of Caterpillar’s operating structure did not coincide with Caterpillar’s reported structure for tax purposes. Mr. Schlicksup informed several Caterpillar executives of his concern, including its Director of Global Tax and Trade, and thereafter its Chief Financial Officer and Caterpillar’s General Counsel. Mr. Schlicksup even filed a complaint with Caterpillar’s Ethics Office, which closed the matter. Mr. Schlicksup’s received employee assessments that he considered prejudiced by his attempts to call attention to the potential tax risk.

Eventually, in July of 2010 Mr. Schlicksup filed a whistleblower retaliation suit under Illinois law against Caterpillar, which Caterpillar settled in 2012 for an undisclosed amount. The Illinois Whistleblower Act prohibits an employer from retaliating against an employee “for refusing to participate in an activity that would result in a violation of a State or federal law, rule, or regulation. . . .” 740 ILCS 174/20. Under the Illinois Whistleblower Act, an action can be retaliatory “if the act or omission would be materially adverse to a reasonable employee and is because of the employee disclosing or attempting to disclose public corruption or wrongdoing.” 740 ILCS 174/20.1.

Mr. Schlicksup’s whistleblower lawsuit led to the April 1, 2014 hearing of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations “Caterpillar’s Offshore Tax Strategy”. In its February 17, 2015 10-K Annual Report, Caterpillar revealed that it is now the subject of a subpoena of a grand jury criminally investigating its transfer pricing practices, and an SEC investigation:

On January 8, 2015, the Company received a grand jury subpoena from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. The subpoena requests documents and information from the Company relating to, among other things, financial information concerning U.S. and non-U.S. Caterpillar subsidiaries (including undistributed profits of non-U.S. subsidiaries and the movement of cash among U.S. and non-U.S. subsidiaries). …

On September 12, 2014, the SEC notified the Company that it was conducting an informal investigation relating to Caterpillar SARL and related structures. …

Hervé Falciani obtained super whistleblower status for downloading from HSBC’s Switzerland bank in 2008 substantial account details of 106,000 high net wealth customers with over $100 billion is assets from 203 countries, and then soliciting tax departments with an emailed that the Wall Street Journal states included the subject line: “Tax evasion: client list available”. The theft of the bank data, reported at over 100 Gigabytes, has led to Mr. Falciani’s arrest in several countries, including Switzerland, France and Spain. But he has been spared extradition to Switzerland because of the French and Spanish courts found a public benefit from exposing HSBC’s widespread conspiracy to commit or at least enable tax fraud. Mr. Falciani has stated that he did not become a whistle blower for reasons of potential compensation. He has established a foundation to promote the protection of whistleblowers.

The most famous tax whistleblower is ultimately UBS’ Bradley Birkenfeld because he specifically blew the lid off of UBS’ policy to assist U.S. taxpayers to evade tax in order to take advantage of the 2006 U.S. Whistleblower Law that allows compensation of:

“at least 15 percent but not more than 30 percent of the collected proceeds (including penalties, interest, additions to tax, and additional amounts) resulting from the action (including any related actions) or from any settlement in response to such action. The determination of the amount of such award by the Whistleblower Office shall depend upon the extent to which the individual substantially contributed to such action.”

Mr. Birkenfeld for a number of years willingly participated in the conspiracy of tax evasion with his clients, including most famously the California real estate billionaire Igor Olenicoff whom he brought into UBS from his previous employer. Regardless, because his cooperation indisputably led to the prosecution of UBS for conspiring to hide $20 billion of assets of 20,000 US taxable persons, in 2012 upon his release from prison (for his guilty plea to one count of tax evasion), the IRS awarded $104 million in whistleblower compensation to Mr. Birkenfeld.

 

 

European Commission to probe McDonald’s tax deal with Luxembourg

McDThe European Commission has just announced a formal investigation of the tax agreement struck between McDonald’s and Luxembourg. Read the full press release here, also read the Unhappy Meals report on McDonald’s tax avoidance schemes. There are many reasons to boycott McDonalds; add tax avoidance to the list.

Continue reading “European Commission to probe McDonald’s tax deal with Luxembourg”

Ex-money launderer Kenneth Rijock offers tips for whistleblowers

9780241954768_TheLaundryMan_fCOVIn this article, first published in the Whistleblower Edition of TJN’s newsletter, Tax Justice Focus, convicted money launderer Kenneth Rijock (author of The Laundry Man, Penguin, 2013) offers some practical advice to those who might be considering blowing the whistle on their employers.  Helpful tip: get yourself a good lawyer.

Continue reading “Ex-money launderer Kenneth Rijock offers tips for whistleblowers”

Kenya as a tax haven would be a ‘financial crime aircraft carrier’

Our quote of the day concerns a plan to turn Nairobi into a “regional finance hub” through the establishment of the Nairobi International Financial Centre (NIFC):

“Anti-corruption campaigner John Githongo has warned that in this setting, the NIFC “would be like a financial crime aircraft carrier, self-contained and able to cause considerable damage”.

Which is a good way to put it. To set up a ‘competitive’ financial centre you have to relax tax laws, tolerate dirty money and abusive financial vehicles, and more. In other words, to be a tax haven. And that is certainly what is being sought here.

And who is behind this initiative? Why, the Lord Mayor of the City of London Corporation and one of the City Corporation’s main lobbying bodies, TheCityUK.

The whole article in African Arguments, entitled Campaigners warn of Kenya’s ‘secretive’ plan to set up International Financial Centre, is well worth reading.

CityUK Kenya

 

New study: corporate tax cuts may have been ‘the greatest blunder’

CCPAThe Canadian Center for Policy Alternatives has just published a new study entitled Do Corporate Income Tax Rate Reductions Accelerate Growth? It summarises:

“This study examines the relationship between the Canadian corporate income tax (CIT) regime and various dimensions of economic growth. The author finds that CIT cuts have not only failed to lead to faster growth, but there is evidence to suggest that—far from spawning higher levels of business investment and GDP growth—corporate income tax reform has indirectly fostered slower growth.”

Continue reading “New study: corporate tax cuts may have been ‘the greatest blunder’”

John Christensen on rocking the boat in Jersey

Not a job application!

Not a job application!

In this blog, first published in the Whistleblower Edition of Tax Justice Focus (available here), TJN’s director John Christensen, a former Economic Adviser to the island of Jersey, reflects on his experience of exposing a banking scandal, which involved him in a direct confrontation with senior politicians and island officials.  In September 1996, the Wall Street Journal published what was effectively his resignation letter in the form of a front-page article titled ‘Offshore Hazard: Isle of Jersey Proves Less Than a Haven to Currency Investors.’

Continue reading “John Christensen on rocking the boat in Jersey”

Survey: corruption rife among accountants.

Fog

Image from www.bleedingobvious.com

From Accountancy Age in the UK:

“The research – by global job board CareersinAudit.com – quizzed 1696 accountants around the planet, including 400 in the UK, showed that 48% had either been pressurised (or knew of someone that had) by a manager or partner to ignore an adjustment that should have been made to a set of accounts.

And four in ten accountants said they were aware of a senior staff member within their organisation making a decision that deliberately chose a commercial result for the company or client, even though the decision could be unethical.”

Continue reading “Survey: corruption rife among accountants.”

The private banking fairy tale: a whistleblower’s story

ubsThis article was originally published in the Whistleblower Edition of Tax Justice Focus (November 2015)

Whistleblowing by finance professionals has begun to make significant inroads into the sector’s culture of secrecy and collusion. Here UBS whistleblower Stéphanie Gibaud describes the costs to the individual of doing the right thing.

Continue reading “The private banking fairy tale: a whistleblower’s story”

UK secrecy jurisdictions are still helping criminals the world over

Spot the common feature: Clue - it's the head of state

Spot the common feature: Clue – it’s the Head of State

30 November 2015

Despite real progress, UK secrecy jurisdictions are still helping criminals the world over, warns report.

UK Prime Minister David Cameron has vowed to lead the global fight against corruption. But, a new assessment released today warns that the UK cannot credibly claim that it has made significant improvements with regard to financial secrecy when jurisdictions it has control over – the Overseas Territories – remain some of the most notorious purveyors of financial secrecy.

The report, by Christian Aid, Global Witness, the Tax Justice Network and Transparency International UK, comes as leaders of the secrecy jurisdictions – the UK’s Overseas Territories – gather in London for their annual meeting with the UK government. The seven Territories include the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands and Bermuda and all are ultimately UK-controlled.

The UK’s Corruption Problem considers two aspects of financial secrecy in the Overseas Territories:

The extent to which bank and other financial accounts can still be hidden from other jurisdictions’ tax authorities. All of the Overseas Territories have made progress over the last two years by agreeing to automatically exchange bank account data with other countries’ tax authorities. No data has yet been exchanged, and the system needs extending such that developing countries can benefit but, nonetheless, progress has been made.

The extent to which tax evaders, the corrupt and other criminals can still hide behind anonymous companies. Montserrat has become the first of the Overseas Territories to promise to put the names of the people who own and control companies – the so-called beneficial owners – into the public domain.

Gibraltar, by virtue of being a member of the EU, will also http://humanrightsfilmnetwork.org/cymbalta have to make the names of beneficial owners available to anyone who can demonstrate a legitimate interest in knowing. Both Gibraltar and Montserrat should make this data fully public, and the other Territories should do the same.

Rosie Sharpe, Global Witness said: “The UK’s Overseas Territories remain some of the world’s most notorious purveyors of financial services to tax evaders, the corrupt and the downright dangerous. A World Bank study found that the most popular places that the corrupt use to incorporate a company are the UK’s Overseas Territories.”

Joseph Stead, Christian Aid said: “With David Cameron planning to host an anti-corruption summit in 2016, now is the time to change things and demonstrate that the UK is as committed to stamping out corruption in its backyard as it is elsewhere in the world.”

Alex Cobham, Tax Justice Network said: “For all the talk about beneficial ownership transparency (and there has been a lot), there has not yet been enough action.”

Read the report here.

Read the FT’s article on the report here

Read the public letter to Prime Minister David Cameron here

Read TJN’s request to Her Majesty the Queen of England (and Head of States of the Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories) to push her Prime Minister to take action here

For more information and to arrange interviews, please contact:

Rachel Baird at Christian Aid on +44 207 523 2446 or [email protected] or +44 7850 242 950
Rosie Sharpe at Global Witness on +45 28 55 83 08, [email protected] or Oliver Courtney at Global Witness on +44 20 7492 5853, +44 7912 517 147, [email protected]
Alex Cobham at Tax Justice Network on +44 7982 236 863 or [email protected]
Dominic Kavakeb at Transparency International UK on +44 20 3096 7695, +44 79 6456 0340

 

Greek shipowners and the competitiveness threat

xThere’s a threat hanging over the Greek government. And it’s been hanging there for decades. An important new special report by Reuters’ Tom Bergin contains this:

“That’s the way Greek shipowners like it. The magnates who run one of the biggest merchant marine fleets in the world have long argued that if Greece tried to tax them, they would leave – and that their departure would devastate the economy. . . . Shipowners have resisted any effort to ditch the tax breaks they enjoy, and no government has dared touch them.”

It’s a threat that has seen their tax exemptions written into the Greek constitution since 1953.

And it’s a threat that raises an awful lot of questions.

For one thing, they threaten to leave at any time – but would they? Talk is cheap. We see this from companies all the time, the world over: they threaten to leave, you tax or regulate them anyway, and still they stay.

For another thing, they claim it would ‘devastate the economy’ if they left. But would it? Here, Bergin does some good legwork. For one thing:

“Today, instead of Greek-based ships manned by Greek sailors, shipping in Greece is mainly made up of small management offices in Piraeus that collect freight fees on behalf of their tax-haven registered parents.”

The ships themselves hardly ever visit Greece, and to be honest much of the shipping-related work, such as insurance, gets done elsewhere. The management firms receive only a small share of the shipping fees. 

Beyond this, though, the standard story goes like this: the shipping industry contributes to around 7.5 percent of GDP, once all ancillary parts are considered. This is supposed to be “bigger than tourism.” Bergin continues:

“But a Reuters analysis of corporate filings and economic data suggests shipping’s heroic role in Greece’s economy is largely a myth.”

And it’s a myth because these statistics include billions that never enter the economy. Things are counted which would never be counted in any other country.

“If Greece counted only payments to Greek companies and individuals – as other countries do – the deep-sea shipping industry’s contribution would be equivalent to around 1 percent of GDP.”

Now this is a little reminiscent of our Finance Curse analysis, where claims for the gross contribution of the financial sector – that part of the financial sector that is more internationally mobile and can also use the threat of relocation to get what it wants — tend to be significantly overblown, and offset by a range of other factors pulling in the other direction.

We don’t have time to do this story justice, but Bergin’s article is an important contribution on an important subject.

Our Spanish podcast is out! Salió nuestro podcast en Castellano

Justicia ImPositiva, Edición 4. 

En la cuarta edición de Justicia ImPositiva revelamos cuáles son los proveedores más significativos en la actividad financiera mundial opaca, así como los impactos y las sorpresas de los resultados del nuevo Índice de Secreto Financiero 2015, publicado este mes por Tax Justice Network. ¿Te gustaría saber dónde ha quedado tu país en la lista? También hablamos de la elección del nuevo presidente argentino, Mauricio Macri, y sus consecuencias para este país, además de la audiencia ante la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos sobre políticas fiscales y derechos humanos, que están íntimamente ligados.

Conversamos con: la investigadora y economista del Centro de Economía y Finanzas para el Desarrollo de Argentina-CEFID-AR Verónica Grondona; la  Directora adjunta del Centro por los Derechos Económicos y Sociales Gaby Oré Aguilar; el Director del Índice de Secreto Financiero de Tax Justice Network, Markus Meinzer,  y el investigador y colaborador en la realización del Índice de Secreto Financiero, Andrés Knobel, de Tax Justice Network Bienvenid@s a este nuevo podcast @J_ImPositiva con @silvia1olmedo y @monicamarchesi para @TaxJusticeNet

How the U.S.A. became a secrecy jurisdiction

FSI USAThis month we published our fourth Financial Secrecy Index (FSI), complete with a series of reports about each of the biggest tax havens and secrecy jurisdictions, looking into the political and economic histories of how and why they went offshore, who was involved, and where the bodies are buried.

Here is our story about how the United States became a secrecy jurisdiction. For a pretty pdf version of this, click here.

All the individual country reports are available on the FSI website.

Continue reading “How the U.S.A. became a secrecy jurisdiction”

Reporting a crime is not a crime

Dr Mary Young

Dr Mary Young

UPDATE: Since publishing this blog on 26th November 2015 the Swiss Federal Court in Bellinzona has sentenced HSBC whistleblower Herve Falciani to five years in prison.  Mr Falciani, who was tried in absentia, was charged with data theft, industrial espionage and violation of Swiss banking secrecy laws.  More here

 

This is an edited version of the editorial written for Tax Justice Focus – The Whistleblower Edition by Mary Alice Young of the University of West England. Continue reading “Reporting a crime is not a crime”

Book review – The Joy of Tax

The following review, by Dan Hind, was first published in the Whistleblower Edition of Tax Justice Focus Continue reading “Book review – The Joy of Tax”

Tax Justice Focus – The Whistleblower edition

xThe latest edition of our newsletter Tax Justice Focus, with a special focus on whistleblowers, is now available for download here.

Guest edited by Mary Alice Young of the University of the West of England, this edition is both an exploration of the difficulties confronting people who want to blow the whistle on companies engaged in providing financial services, and an acknowledgment of their personal courage.

For decades the world of offshore finance has been shrouded in deep secrecy.  Created by and on behalf of the wealthiest and most powerful people on the planet, offshore finance has been a mechanism for them to sidestep taxation, regulation, investigation and democracy.   Offshore secrecy takes many forms, and has been reinforced by the strong omertá that grips the offshore finance industry.  As we have witnessed in recent years, banks and accounting firms are particularly ruthless is their treatment of whistleblowers,and they are supported by the secrecy jurisdictions from which they operate, see here and here for example.  As Young observes:

“Offshore jurisdictions are in the business of making life difficult for whistleblowers through formal legislation and through the informal forcement of social codes; the unwritten rules of conduct and the herd mentality that affect those who work in the financial sector. To borrow from hackers’ slang, hostility to whistleblowers is a feature, not a bug; it is an attractive part of the financial secrecy package which offshore jurisdictions peddle to clients.”

But not every banker or accountant is gripped by the herd mentality.  Exceptions stand out; people who can resist the lure of high salaries and excessive lifestyles, and who have the courage to stand up for their principles, normally at great personal price.  As UBS whistleblower Stéphanie Gibaud comments in the lead feature article:

” . . when one understands that there is something wrong with private banking – in effect, offshore banking, blowing the whistle internally or externally can feel like committing suicide: a quick death or a long and painful one, but the end of a certain kind of life, nonetheless.

. . . the so-called privileged elite is extremely well organized and is united when it comes to defending their own interests. Private banking is one part, an important part, of this organization in defence of privilege.

Once you have blown the whistle in the private banking sector, well-trained managers will do all they can to crush you like an insect. Their techniques will vary in intensity from demotion and social isolation all the way through to discrimination and harassment. Your reputation will suddenly be ruined throughout the financial sector. Insurance companies and business partners but also the clients of the private banks will all hear about your supposed failings.”

Whistleblowing is not for the faint-hearted; as TJN’s director, John Christensen, himself a whistleblower, dryly observes, anyone who exposes the corrupt practices of the offshore enablers can expect “Savage kickback from employers whose business models are based on secrecy; they will do whatever it takes to punish you as a deterrent to others. The rich and powerful are at their most thuggish when their backs are up against the wall.”

In this edition:

Stephanie Gibaud reflects on her experience in private banking and explores the reality of what happens once someone decides to speak out about unethical or illegal activity, and stresses the lengths to which the banking industry will go to ensure that the whistleblower is isolated, degraded and denounced. She goes on to ask a number of searching questions about the silence that surrounds elite criminality.

John Christensen reflects on his experiences when he decided to speak out about malpractice in the highly secretive jurisdiction of Jersey, and gives a sober assessment of what whistleblowers can expect from their colleagues, employers, friends, media and judiciary once they stick their heads over the parapet.

Kenneth Rijock, both a lawyer and convicted money launderer, gives wouldbe whistleblowers a brief introduction to information security – the techniques that we can use to avoid detection by crooked employers and, ultimately, jail.

William Byrnes introduces us to three of the highest profile whistleblowers from the financial sector, and explores the relationship between whistleblowing and tax compliance and highlights the much anticipated legislation of several offshore jurisdictions who are looking to introduce statutory laws to protect whistleblowers who report tax crimes.

Radio producer Naomi Fowler talks about the extraordinary difficulties journalists face when trying to persuade editors of the newsworthiness of offshore finance.  In Naomi’s words:

“As a journalist and citizen I thought these issues were dynamite, something to be shouted from the rooftops, that everyone should know about. But radio stations wanted mafia stories from Sicily or bribery stories from Latin America, where I was sometimes based. To no avail I tried to explain I had much bigger corruption stories from the City of London, of staggering global significance.”

And Dan Hind reviews Richard Murphy’s new book The Joy of Tax, reflecting that “Murphy has done terrible damage to the cosy consensus that once protected the offshore sector. In The Joy of Tax he sets out to do the same to the onshore conventional wisdom. It is one hell of a fight to pick. But he’s used to apparently impossible odds.”

Download The Whistleblower’s Edition here, and feel free to circulate it to colleagues and friends.