Ex-money launderer Kenneth Rijock offers tips for whistleblowers

9780241954768_TheLaundryMan_fCOVIn this article, first published in the Whistleblower Edition of TJN’s newsletter, Tax Justice Focus, convicted money launderer Kenneth Rijock (author of The Laundry Man, Penguin, 2013) offers some practical advice to those who might be considering blowing the whistle on their employers.  Helpful tip: get yourself a good lawyer.

Continue reading “Ex-money launderer Kenneth Rijock offers tips for whistleblowers”

Kenya as a tax haven would be a ‘financial crime aircraft carrier’

Our quote of the day concerns a plan to turn Nairobi into a “regional finance hub” through the establishment of the Nairobi International Financial Centre (NIFC):

“Anti-corruption campaigner John Githongo has warned that in this setting, the NIFC “would be like a financial crime aircraft carrier, self-contained and able to cause considerable damage”.

Which is a good way to put it. To set up a ‘competitive’ financial centre you have to relax tax laws, tolerate dirty money and abusive financial vehicles, and more. In other words, to be a tax haven. And that is certainly what is being sought here.

And who is behind this initiative? Why, the Lord Mayor of the City of London Corporation and one of the City Corporation’s main lobbying bodies, TheCityUK.

The whole article in African Arguments, entitled Campaigners warn of Kenya’s ‘secretive’ plan to set up International Financial Centre, is well worth reading.

CityUK Kenya

 

New study: corporate tax cuts may have been ‘the greatest blunder’

CCPAThe Canadian Center for Policy Alternatives has just published a new study entitled Do Corporate Income Tax Rate Reductions Accelerate Growth? It summarises:

“This study examines the relationship between the Canadian corporate income tax (CIT) regime and various dimensions of economic growth. The author finds that CIT cuts have not only failed to lead to faster growth, but there is evidence to suggest that—far from spawning higher levels of business investment and GDP growth—corporate income tax reform has indirectly fostered slower growth.”

Continue reading “New study: corporate tax cuts may have been ‘the greatest blunder’”

John Christensen on rocking the boat in Jersey

Not a job application!

Not a job application!

In this blog, first published in the Whistleblower Edition of Tax Justice Focus (available here), TJN’s director John Christensen, a former Economic Adviser to the island of Jersey, reflects on his experience of exposing a banking scandal, which involved him in a direct confrontation with senior politicians and island officials.  In September 1996, the Wall Street Journal published what was effectively his resignation letter in the form of a front-page article titled ‘Offshore Hazard: Isle of Jersey Proves Less Than a Haven to Currency Investors.’

Continue reading “John Christensen on rocking the boat in Jersey”

Survey: corruption rife among accountants.

Fog

Image from www.bleedingobvious.com

From Accountancy Age in the UK:

“The research – by global job board CareersinAudit.com – quizzed 1696 accountants around the planet, including 400 in the UK, showed that 48% had either been pressurised (or knew of someone that had) by a manager or partner to ignore an adjustment that should have been made to a set of accounts.

And four in ten accountants said they were aware of a senior staff member within their organisation making a decision that deliberately chose a commercial result for the company or client, even though the decision could be unethical.”

Continue reading “Survey: corruption rife among accountants.”

The private banking fairy tale: a whistleblower’s story

ubsThis article was originally published in the Whistleblower Edition of Tax Justice Focus (November 2015)

Whistleblowing by finance professionals has begun to make significant inroads into the sector’s culture of secrecy and collusion. Here UBS whistleblower Stéphanie Gibaud describes the costs to the individual of doing the right thing.

Continue reading “The private banking fairy tale: a whistleblower’s story”

UK secrecy jurisdictions are still helping criminals the world over

Spot the common feature: Clue - it's the head of state

Spot the common feature: Clue – it’s the Head of State

30 November 2015

Despite real progress, UK secrecy jurisdictions are still helping criminals the world over, warns report.

UK Prime Minister David Cameron has vowed to lead the global fight against corruption. But, a new assessment released today warns that the UK cannot credibly claim that it has made significant improvements with regard to financial secrecy when jurisdictions it has control over – the Overseas Territories – remain some of the most notorious purveyors of financial secrecy.

The report, by Christian Aid, Global Witness, the Tax Justice Network and Transparency International UK, comes as leaders of the secrecy jurisdictions – the UK’s Overseas Territories – gather in London for their annual meeting with the UK government. The seven Territories include the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands and Bermuda and all are ultimately UK-controlled.

The UK’s Corruption Problem considers two aspects of financial secrecy in the Overseas Territories:

The extent to which bank and other financial accounts can still be hidden from other jurisdictions’ tax authorities. All of the Overseas Territories have made progress over the last two years by agreeing to automatically exchange bank account data with other countries’ tax authorities. No data has yet been exchanged, and the system needs extending such that developing countries can benefit but, nonetheless, progress has been made.

The extent to which tax evaders, the corrupt and other criminals can still hide behind anonymous companies. Montserrat has become the first of the Overseas Territories to promise to put the names of the people who own and control companies – the so-called beneficial owners – into the public domain.

Gibraltar, by virtue of being a member of the EU, will also http://humanrightsfilmnetwork.org/cymbalta have to make the names of beneficial owners available to anyone who can demonstrate a legitimate interest in knowing. Both Gibraltar and Montserrat should make this data fully public, and the other Territories should do the same.

Rosie Sharpe, Global Witness said: “The UK’s Overseas Territories remain some of the world’s most notorious purveyors of financial services to tax evaders, the corrupt and the downright dangerous. A World Bank study found that the most popular places that the corrupt use to incorporate a company are the UK’s Overseas Territories.”

Joseph Stead, Christian Aid said: “With David Cameron planning to host an anti-corruption summit in 2016, now is the time to change things and demonstrate that the UK is as committed to stamping out corruption in its backyard as it is elsewhere in the world.”

Alex Cobham, Tax Justice Network said: “For all the talk about beneficial ownership transparency (and there has been a lot), there has not yet been enough action.”

Read the report here.

Read the FT’s article on the report here

Read the public letter to Prime Minister David Cameron here

Read TJN’s request to Her Majesty the Queen of England (and Head of States of the Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories) to push her Prime Minister to take action here

For more information and to arrange interviews, please contact:

Rachel Baird at Christian Aid on +44 207 523 2446 or [email protected] or +44 7850 242 950
Rosie Sharpe at Global Witness on +45 28 55 83 08, [email protected] or Oliver Courtney at Global Witness on +44 20 7492 5853, +44 7912 517 147, [email protected]
Alex Cobham at Tax Justice Network on +44 7982 236 863 or [email protected]
Dominic Kavakeb at Transparency International UK on +44 20 3096 7695, +44 79 6456 0340

 

Greek shipowners and the competitiveness threat

xThere’s a threat hanging over the Greek government. And it’s been hanging there for decades. An important new special report by Reuters’ Tom Bergin contains this:

“That’s the way Greek shipowners like it. The magnates who run one of the biggest merchant marine fleets in the world have long argued that if Greece tried to tax them, they would leave – and that their departure would devastate the economy. . . . Shipowners have resisted any effort to ditch the tax breaks they enjoy, and no government has dared touch them.”

It’s a threat that has seen their tax exemptions written into the Greek constitution since 1953.

And it’s a threat that raises an awful lot of questions.

For one thing, they threaten to leave at any time – but would they? Talk is cheap. We see this from companies all the time, the world over: they threaten to leave, you tax or regulate them anyway, and still they stay.

For another thing, they claim it would ‘devastate the economy’ if they left. But would it? Here, Bergin does some good legwork. For one thing:

“Today, instead of Greek-based ships manned by Greek sailors, shipping in Greece is mainly made up of small management offices in Piraeus that collect freight fees on behalf of their tax-haven registered parents.”

The ships themselves hardly ever visit Greece, and to be honest much of the shipping-related work, such as insurance, gets done elsewhere. The management firms receive only a small share of the shipping fees. 

Beyond this, though, the standard story goes like this: the shipping industry contributes to around 7.5 percent of GDP, once all ancillary parts are considered. This is supposed to be “bigger than tourism.” Bergin continues:

“But a Reuters analysis of corporate filings and economic data suggests shipping’s heroic role in Greece’s economy is largely a myth.”

And it’s a myth because these statistics include billions that never enter the economy. Things are counted which would never be counted in any other country.

“If Greece counted only payments to Greek companies and individuals – as other countries do – the deep-sea shipping industry’s contribution would be equivalent to around 1 percent of GDP.”

Now this is a little reminiscent of our Finance Curse analysis, where claims for the gross contribution of the financial sector – that part of the financial sector that is more internationally mobile and can also use the threat of relocation to get what it wants — tend to be significantly overblown, and offset by a range of other factors pulling in the other direction.

We don’t have time to do this story justice, but Bergin’s article is an important contribution on an important subject.

Our Spanish podcast is out! Salió nuestro podcast en Castellano

Justicia ImPositiva, Edición 4. 

En la cuarta edición de Justicia ImPositiva revelamos cuáles son los proveedores más significativos en la actividad financiera mundial opaca, así como los impactos y las sorpresas de los resultados del nuevo Índice de Secreto Financiero 2015, publicado este mes por Tax Justice Network. ¿Te gustaría saber dónde ha quedado tu país en la lista? También hablamos de la elección del nuevo presidente argentino, Mauricio Macri, y sus consecuencias para este país, además de la audiencia ante la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos sobre políticas fiscales y derechos humanos, que están íntimamente ligados.

Conversamos con: la investigadora y economista del Centro de Economía y Finanzas para el Desarrollo de Argentina-CEFID-AR Verónica Grondona; la  Directora adjunta del Centro por los Derechos Económicos y Sociales Gaby Oré Aguilar; el Director del Índice de Secreto Financiero de Tax Justice Network, Markus Meinzer,  y el investigador y colaborador en la realización del Índice de Secreto Financiero, Andrés Knobel, de Tax Justice Network Bienvenid@s a este nuevo podcast @J_ImPositiva con @silvia1olmedo y @monicamarchesi para @TaxJusticeNet

How the U.S.A. became a secrecy jurisdiction

FSI USAThis month we published our fourth Financial Secrecy Index (FSI), complete with a series of reports about each of the biggest tax havens and secrecy jurisdictions, looking into the political and economic histories of how and why they went offshore, who was involved, and where the bodies are buried.

Here is our story about how the United States became a secrecy jurisdiction. For a pretty pdf version of this, click here.

All the individual country reports are available on the FSI website.

Continue reading “How the U.S.A. became a secrecy jurisdiction”

Reporting a crime is not a crime

Dr Mary Young

Dr Mary Young

UPDATE: Since publishing this blog on 26th November 2015 the Swiss Federal Court in Bellinzona has sentenced HSBC whistleblower Herve Falciani to five years in prison.  Mr Falciani, who was tried in absentia, was charged with data theft, industrial espionage and violation of Swiss banking secrecy laws.  More here

 

This is an edited version of the editorial written for Tax Justice Focus – The Whistleblower Edition by Mary Alice Young of the University of West England. Continue reading “Reporting a crime is not a crime”

Book review – The Joy of Tax

The following review, by Dan Hind, was first published in the Whistleblower Edition of Tax Justice Focus Continue reading “Book review – The Joy of Tax”

Tax Justice Focus – The Whistleblower edition

xThe latest edition of our newsletter Tax Justice Focus, with a special focus on whistleblowers, is now available for download here.

Guest edited by Mary Alice Young of the University of the West of England, this edition is both an exploration of the difficulties confronting people who want to blow the whistle on companies engaged in providing financial services, and an acknowledgment of their personal courage.

For decades the world of offshore finance has been shrouded in deep secrecy.  Created by and on behalf of the wealthiest and most powerful people on the planet, offshore finance has been a mechanism for them to sidestep taxation, regulation, investigation and democracy.   Offshore secrecy takes many forms, and has been reinforced by the strong omertá that grips the offshore finance industry.  As we have witnessed in recent years, banks and accounting firms are particularly ruthless is their treatment of whistleblowers,and they are supported by the secrecy jurisdictions from which they operate, see here and here for example.  As Young observes:

“Offshore jurisdictions are in the business of making life difficult for whistleblowers through formal legislation and through the informal forcement of social codes; the unwritten rules of conduct and the herd mentality that affect those who work in the financial sector. To borrow from hackers’ slang, hostility to whistleblowers is a feature, not a bug; it is an attractive part of the financial secrecy package which offshore jurisdictions peddle to clients.”

But not every banker or accountant is gripped by the herd mentality.  Exceptions stand out; people who can resist the lure of high salaries and excessive lifestyles, and who have the courage to stand up for their principles, normally at great personal price.  As UBS whistleblower Stéphanie Gibaud comments in the lead feature article:

” . . when one understands that there is something wrong with private banking – in effect, offshore banking, blowing the whistle internally or externally can feel like committing suicide: a quick death or a long and painful one, but the end of a certain kind of life, nonetheless.

. . . the so-called privileged elite is extremely well organized and is united when it comes to defending their own interests. Private banking is one part, an important part, of this organization in defence of privilege.

Once you have blown the whistle in the private banking sector, well-trained managers will do all they can to crush you like an insect. Their techniques will vary in intensity from demotion and social isolation all the way through to discrimination and harassment. Your reputation will suddenly be ruined throughout the financial sector. Insurance companies and business partners but also the clients of the private banks will all hear about your supposed failings.”

Whistleblowing is not for the faint-hearted; as TJN’s director, John Christensen, himself a whistleblower, dryly observes, anyone who exposes the corrupt practices of the offshore enablers can expect “Savage kickback from employers whose business models are based on secrecy; they will do whatever it takes to punish you as a deterrent to others. The rich and powerful are at their most thuggish when their backs are up against the wall.”

In this edition:

Stephanie Gibaud reflects on her experience in private banking and explores the reality of what happens once someone decides to speak out about unethical or illegal activity, and stresses the lengths to which the banking industry will go to ensure that the whistleblower is isolated, degraded and denounced. She goes on to ask a number of searching questions about the silence that surrounds elite criminality.

John Christensen reflects on his experiences when he decided to speak out about malpractice in the highly secretive jurisdiction of Jersey, and gives a sober assessment of what whistleblowers can expect from their colleagues, employers, friends, media and judiciary once they stick their heads over the parapet.

Kenneth Rijock, both a lawyer and convicted money launderer, gives wouldbe whistleblowers a brief introduction to information security – the techniques that we can use to avoid detection by crooked employers and, ultimately, jail.

William Byrnes introduces us to three of the highest profile whistleblowers from the financial sector, and explores the relationship between whistleblowing and tax compliance and highlights the much anticipated legislation of several offshore jurisdictions who are looking to introduce statutory laws to protect whistleblowers who report tax crimes.

Radio producer Naomi Fowler talks about the extraordinary difficulties journalists face when trying to persuade editors of the newsworthiness of offshore finance.  In Naomi’s words:

“As a journalist and citizen I thought these issues were dynamite, something to be shouted from the rooftops, that everyone should know about. But radio stations wanted mafia stories from Sicily or bribery stories from Latin America, where I was sometimes based. To no avail I tried to explain I had much bigger corruption stories from the City of London, of staggering global significance.”

And Dan Hind reviews Richard Murphy’s new book The Joy of Tax, reflecting that “Murphy has done terrible damage to the cosy consensus that once protected the offshore sector. In The Joy of Tax he sets out to do the same to the onshore conventional wisdom. It is one hell of a fight to pick. But he’s used to apparently impossible odds.”

Download The Whistleblower’s Edition here, and feel free to circulate it to colleagues and friends.

 

 

 

New report: tax treaties in sub-Saharan Africa

New TJN-Africa report

New TJN-Africa report

Via Martin Hearson’s website, here is a new report he authored for Tax Justice Network-Africa. As Hearson says, it’s based on field research done a year ago and has been a little while getting into print.

Here’s a link to read it online at academia.edu

Here’s a link to download the PDF

Among many other things, the report highlights the extent to which tax treaties — which have profound implications for how the tax revenues from cross-border investments are shared between countries (see here) — have been negotiated amid highly unequal power relationships: Continue reading “New report: tax treaties in sub-Saharan Africa”

The Tax Justice Network’s November 2015 Taxcast

In the Tax Justice Network’s November 2015 Taxcast: Why is the City of London losing so much business to New York, Hong Kong and Singapore? Our conclusions are quite different from those of a British Bankers Association report on the subject.  Listen to the Taxcast here. Continue reading “The Tax Justice Network’s November 2015 Taxcast”

Short animation: tax is paid by everyone, for everyone

From TJN-Israel and law students at Israel’s College of Law and Business, an excellent short animation reminding people of the roles that tax plays in civilised society. Enjoy.

The Norwegian shareholder registry: now open for all

A random excerpt, obtained by TJN three minutes ago. Click to enlarge.

A random excerpt, obtained by TJN 90 seconds ago. Click to enlarge. Better still, try it for yourself.

The Norwegian Shareholder Registry now open for all

A guest blog by Sigrid Klæboe Jacobsen, Director, TJN-Norge

Two programmers from an IT company, acting on their own initiative, spent a weekend doing the job that the Government hasn’t wanted to do: they have made it possible for anyone to search the Norwegian Shareholders Registry.

You can now search all Norwegian shareholders at the website www.aksjeeiere.no Continue reading “The Norwegian shareholder registry: now open for all”

Colombia and civil war: the role of tax

Thomas Mortensen

Thomas Mortensen, country manager for Christian Aid in Colombia

A guest blog By Thomas Mortensen, with thanks. A bilateral ceasefire is due in Colombia in the coming weeks, hopefully December 16th.

Tax is not the most obvious remedy for civil war but in the case of Colombia, it could go a long way. The country has suffered an internal armed conflict for more than 50 years, which has left 7 million victims. One of the underlying causes of the war is economic inequality. Colombia is the most unequal country in Latin America and tenth in the world[1]. One of the reasons for this is that Colombia’s fiscal system has completely failed to reduce inequality. Continue reading “Colombia and civil war: the role of tax”

Britain can force its tax havens to curb secrecy. But will it?

The buck stops at Buckingham Palace

Does the buck stop at Buckingham Palace?

Jolyon Maugham, a UK tax barrister, has written a useful blog looking at promises the UK coalition government made before the last election about getting its offshore satellites to curb financial secrecy — and then he has compared those promises to the actions that have been taken since then.

Do read the whole short blog, but the conclusion is:

“What’s happened?

. . .

In a word, nothing.

The UK does possess the power to force our tax havens to adopt this measure – at least that’s what an article in the highly respected New Law Journal concluded. It’s just a matter of political will. Which seems to be in rather shorter supply after the General Election than it was before it.

Continue reading “Britain can force its tax havens to curb secrecy. But will it?”

Who ultimately pays the corporate income tax? (Again.)

clausing07

Kimberly Clausing, US tax academic

We have written many times about the ‘incidence’ (or, if you like) burden of the corporate income tax. When you tax corporations, who ultimately pays it: the workers, through lower wages? The consumers, through higher prices? Or is it the shareholders and owners of capital?

It’s a crucial question. Defenders of wealth and entrenched privilege love to argue that it’s ‘workers’ who ultimately pay the tax: if they can persuade people that that is true then they can argue that it’s a pointless, regressive tax and should just be abolished.  It’s often accompanied by sniggering about ‘lefties’ hitting the wrong targets and confidently delivered statements like “most economists agree that the burden falls on workers.” Continue reading “Who ultimately pays the corporate income tax? (Again.)”

Crickhowell and the tax rebellion: the mouse that roared?

Bucolic Crickhowell: are these tax schemes open to the public though?

Bucolic Crickhowell: but are these corporate tax schemes open to the public?

Update: the Crickhowell activists have set up a new website: Fair Tax Town.

We’re delighted to see that a forthcoming BBC TV programme will highlight a major tax injustice that we have long drawn attention to: that multinational corporations are killing small businesses partly by being able to out-dodge them on tax. Britain’s Independent newspaper reports:

“When independent traders in a small Welsh town discovered the loopholes used by multinational giants to avoid paying UK tax, they didn’t just get mad.

Now local businesses in Crickhowell are turning the tables on the likes of Google and Starbucks by employing the same accountancy practices used by the world’s biggest companies, to move their entire town “offshore”.

Continue reading “Crickhowell and the tax rebellion: the mouse that roared?”

How Ireland became an offshore financial centre

IrelandThis month we published our fourth Financial Secrecy Index (FSI), complete with a series of reports about each of the biggest tax havens and secrecy jurisdictions, looking into the political and economic histories of how and why they went offshore, who was involved, and where the bodies are buried.

The one report that wasn’t ready on publication date last week was Ireland. Now, finally, here it is. It is pasted below – but it’s also available in a prettier pdf version, here.

All the individual country reports are available on the FSI website.

Continue reading “How Ireland became an offshore financial centre”