UN calls UK to account over impact of unjust tax laws

A United Nations body has called on the single largest financial secrecy jurisdiction in the world – the United Kingdom and its Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies – to account for the human rights impacts of its unjust tax policies at home and abroad.

The call was issued by the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which oversees compliance with the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. logoDrawing on a joint report by the Center for Economic and Social Rights (CESR), the Tax Justice Network (TJN) and the Global Justice Clinic at NYU School of Law (GJC), the Committee voiced concerns that the UK’s financial secrecy legislation and permissive rules on corporate tax are undermining the proper resourcing of human rights, thereby affecting the ability of other States to mobilize resources for the implementation of economic, social and cultural rights. Continue reading “UN calls UK to account over impact of unjust tax laws”

New EU Directive on Money Laundering – a curate’s egg

CurateThe European Union, amid all the Brexit turmoil, has issued a proposal for a new Directive on money laundering and terrorist financing. Transparency, of course, is at the core of it. The Panama Papers scandal has given new urgency to the task of unmasking the corrupt, the crooks and other financial miscreants, and it’s clear that business supports us: in a survey of 2,800 senior executives in 62 countries, Ernst & Young found that 91% of respondents believe it is important to know the ultimate beneficial ownership of the entities with which they do business.

So how does the new Directive (an amendment to what is known as the Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive) look? In short, there are two main things. Continue reading “New EU Directive on Money Laundering – a curate’s egg”

Anti-tax, anti-regulation sirens already emerging after Brexit

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

The race to the bottom: a clear winner

The race to the bottom: the UK forges ahead

Just before the Brexit vote we quoted Adam Posen, President of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, about what might happen in a post-Brexit Britain:

“If you’re anti-regulation fantasists to begin with, you start going down the path, ‘Oh we can become an even more offshore center. We can become the Cayman Islands writ large, or Panama writ large.’ And this frankly is the way I think this also spills over to the rest of the world, is that the UK decides, ‘Hey, regulatory arbitrage, letting AIG financial products run in London, actually destroyed the US financial system, but didn’t hurt us – made us a lot of money. Let us continue down this path. Let us be the ‘race to the bottom’ financial center. And I think this that’s where this going, because they’re not going to have any other option. It’s not good.”

And this is already being played out. Take a look, just for example, at this quote from Chris Cummings of the extremely peculiar and powerful TheCityUK (and by extension the City of London Corporation), illustrating Posen’s point very exactly: Continue reading “Anti-tax, anti-regulation sirens already emerging after Brexit”

Two new transparency advances, in UK and US

The best disinfectant

The best disinfectant

From Global Witness:

“Information on who ultimately owns and controls British companies goes live for the first time today.”

That’s good news, amid all the Brexit brouhaha (and idiotic and dangerous plans to privatise the UK’s Land Registry.) Meanwhile, the FACT coalition in the United States describes a different development in corporate transparency:

The U.S. Department of Treasury released new rules today to require multinational companies to report profits and taxes paid on a country by country basis.  This is the first time that this information is being gathered in the United States and shared with other nations.  The information will be filed with the IRS and shared with states’ and other countries’ tax authorities with which the U.S. has agreements to exchange tax information.”

Continue reading “Two new transparency advances, in UK and US”

Brexit gets worse as London seeks to wriggle free from UK

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

London, going further offshore?

London, going further offshore?

Cross-posted from Fools’ Gold.

We have our own particular reasons for disliking Brexit – the recent decision by the UK to leave the European Union.

In a pre-Brexit analysis we quoted Adam Posen, director of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, who articulated what is probably our biggest generic concern:

“If you’re anti-regulation fantasists to begin with, you start going down the path, ‘Oh we can become an even more offshore center. We can become the Cayman Islands writ large, or Panama writ large.’ And this frankly is the way I think this also spills over to the rest of the world, is that the UK decides, ‘Hey, regulatory arbitrage, letting AIG financial products run in London, actually destroyed the US financial system, but didn’t hurt us – made us a lot of money. Let us continue down this path. Let us be the ‘race to the bottom’ financial center. And I think this that’s where this going, because they’re not going to have any other option. It’s not good.”

Continue reading “Brexit gets worse as London seeks to wriggle free from UK”

The #LuxLeaks whistleblowers verdict: our statement

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The verdicts are in. Today the Luxembourg court sentenced Antoine Deltour to 12 month suspended jail time and a €1,500 fine. Raphaël Halet is sentenced to 9-month suspended jail time and a 1,000 € fine. The journalist Edouard Perrin was acquitted. A statement from Antoine Deltour’s support committee is here.

Antoine Deltour said:

“Sentencing the citizens at the origin of LuxLeaks revelations is equivalent to sentencing the regulatory advancements which have been triggered by these revelations and which have been widely acclaimed across Europe. This is also a warning towards future whistleblowers, which is detrimental to citizen’s information and the good functioning of the democracy.”

These whistleblowers are heroes who acted in the public interest, the public interest of all the other countries in the EU and beyond, which have lost enormous tax revenues to the secret deals drawn up by the Luxembourg state; but also the public interest of Luxembourg itself, where citizens are now able to see how far the state has corrupted itself in the interests of poaching the tax base from activities that take place elsewhere.

It is our position that Luxembourg itself has been on trial in this case, and has been found guilty on multiple counts.

We must ask too, in whose interest has the trial of these heroes been? Not the citizens and domestic companies of Luxembourg, for whom no secret deals were on offer. Not the Luxembourg state, which should be addressing the shocking failures of governance that have been revealed. No, this trial appears to have been carried out at the prompting of PwC, the big 4 accounting firm who led the others in exploiting these secretive opportunities for abuse. Where are PwC and the rest of the big 4 today? Do they welcome the prosecution of whistleblowers? Or do they hang their heads in shame for the tax abuses they have commissioned and profited from?

The Tax Justice Network now calls on the big 4 firms to present aggregate data annually, showing the alignment or otherwise of their clients’ declared profits with the location of their real economic activity – and the tax implications. They should also support their clients to publish individually the country-by-country reporting that will show which companies are playing by the rules, and which are cheating the system.

END[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/1″][vc_raw_js]

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

[/vc_raw_js][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/1″][vc_column_text]Via e-mail, we’ve had a couple of other statements, from other organisations.

First, Christian Aid:

Wednesday 29th June 2016

PROTECT WHISTLEBLOWERS & END SECRECY AROUND MULTINATIONALS’ TAX: CHRISTIAN AID

As whistleblowers who exposed multinationals’ cosy tax deals were sentenced in Luxembourg today, Christian Aid said the public should thank, not punish them.

“These whistleblowers deserve our thanks for exposing the scandalous ‘sweetheart’ tax deals between governments and multinationals,” said Toby Quantrill, Christian Aid’s Principal Adviser on Economic Justice.

“The deals were deeply unfair to the millions of ordinary people and small companies who have no choice but to pay their taxes and who need the hospitals, schools and many other public services funded by tax.

”Even though the sentences handed down today were suspended, they send completely the wrong signal about what the whistleblowers did. For society at large, they were heroes, not villains.”

Mr Quantrill added: “One of the many disturbing aspects of this case is that more than a year after LuxLeaks, very little has changed. We still don’t know what taxes multinationals pay in each country, or what cosy deals they may have done with European governments, including the UK’s.

“Despite the outrage around scandals such as LuxLeaks, we remain reliant on people prepared to risk prison to reveal information which should already be in the public domain. That is a further scandal.”

However in an encouraging development yesterday (Tuesday 28th June), UK MPs came very close to approving a reform that would help curb multinational tax dodging around the world.

The move almost won House of Commons approval, after 273 MPs from all the major parties voted in favour – only 22 short of the number needed.

The Chancellor George Osborne is now facing calls to use his power to ensure the ‘ShowMeTheMoney’ amendment to the Finance Bill becomes law.

It would require multinational companies above a certain size to publish information that they already have to give the UK taxman, about key details of their business in each country where they operate.

Such information can reveal suspicious patterns which warrant further investigation and may reflect a firm’s failure to pay its fair share of tax in all the countries where it operates.

Caroline Flint, MP for Don Valley, tabled the amendment, which was in turn backed by MPs from the Conservatives, UKIP, the Liberal Democrats, Labour, the Scottish Nationalists, the Greens, Plaid Cymru and the SDLP. Others supporting the amendment included Christian Aid, Oxfam, Save the Children, ActionAid and the Tax Justice Network.

Second, Eurodad:

Campaigners condemn punishment of Luxleaks whistleblowers who acted in the public interest

Wednesday June 29 2016

Tax Justice campaigners today condemned the punishment of Antoine Deltour and Raphaël Halet – two whistleblowers who were instrumental in exposing the infamous ‘Luxleaks’ scandal.

Mr Deltour was given a 12 month suspended prison sentence and a €1500 fine. Mr Halet was given a 9 month suspended prison sentence and a €1000 fine. French journalist Edouard Perrin was acquitted.

All three men helped expose the secret sweetheart deals signed by the Luxembourg government that allowed numerous multinational corporations to reduce their tax bills dramatically, in some cases to less than 1%.

Tove Ryding, Tax justice Coordinator at the European Network on Debt and Development (Eurodad) said: “The sentences imposed on these men are a complete disgrace and an indictment of the system that has condemned them. They acted in the public interest and deserve thanks and protection from prosecution. They revealed the secret tax deals that allowed huge corporations to pay next to nothing to the public purse. These kind of deals mean both developed countries, and the poorest nations in the world, lose billions every year.

“This information should not have been secret in the first place. There is no reason why citizens should not be allowed to know where multinational corporations do their business and where they pay their taxes.”

More than 200,000 people have shown their support for Antoine Deltour through this online petition alone: https://www.change.org/p/support-antoine-deltour-luxleaks?lang=en-GB

Ryding said: “We are calling for protection for all whistleblowers so that what happened to these three men today can never happen again. We also believe it is about time for the politicians to make multinational corporations publish the numbers showing where they make their profits and where they pay their taxes.”

ENDS

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

New ranking of how transparent the think tanks are

From Transparify.com, a new report:

“We visited think tanks’ websites and looked at the funding and donor information disclosed online, including in online annual reports. Institutions rated with the maximum of five stars are highly transparent about who funds them. Think tanks with four stars are broadly transparent; typically, they do not disclose the precise amounts given, but instead group their donors into several funding brackets. On the opposite end of the spectrum, the funding of think tanks with zero stars or one star is highly opaque as they fail to disclose even the names of some or all of their donors.”

And the results for the UK are here (other tables are available for other regions). Continue reading “New ranking of how transparent the think tanks are”

Should Europe trust trusts?

TJN logoEmbargoed until 6pm CET 28 June 2016

Should Europe trust trusts?

Press Release: New report exposes holes in global and EU anti-money laundering rules on trusts, and explains how they can be fixed.

Trusts, in the popular imagination, are mostly for family matters, such as a rich father deciding how his offspring will divide the inheritance. But they are far more widely used: not just for multiple commercial purposes, but also, as the Panama Papers reminded us, to commit crimes and abuses such as tax evasion, money laundering, corruption, defrauding creditors, and more. Trusts are in many ways a greater threat to democracy than opaque shell companies – yet also harder to crack. The accompanying Tax Justice Network briefing exposes shortcomings in current international frameworks for dealing with trusts, and explains what international bodies such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF,) the European Union, and major countries, could do to pierce trust-related secrecy and prevent their misuse. Continue reading “Should Europe trust trusts?”

Luxembourg on trial as Luxleaks whistleblowers await tomorrow’s verdict

Antoine Deltour, Edouard Perrin, Raphael Halet

Antoine Deltour, Edouard Perrin, Raphael Halet

Tomorrow afternoon the “LuxLeaks” trial will end and the two whistleblowers, Antoine Deltour and Raphaël Halet, as well as the journalist Eduard Perrin, will know whether they will be punished or not, for breaking Luxembourg’s secrecy regime. They face up to 18 months in jail for exposing lurid details of some of the most artificial and egregious schemes cooked up by PwC for the world’s banks and other multinationals – and the latter group seem to have got off the hook entirely. Earlier, Britain’s Private Eye accurately described the whole crooked process:

“the Grand Duchy’s multi-billion euro tax avoidance industry, the accountants who control it and the Ruritanian http://healthsavy.com/product/ambien/ justice system that persecutes the whistleblowers and journalist who exposed it.”

Protests are planned in Paris and Luxembourg – do turn up, if you’re in the area.  Continue reading “Luxembourg on trial as Luxleaks whistleblowers await tomorrow’s verdict”

Kenya tax haven approaching: secrecy to be enforced with prison terms

We have for a while been sounding alarms about the emergence of (yet) another tax haven/secrecy jurisdiction in Kenya. A few months ago we quoted the newspaper African Arguments:

“Anti-corruption campaigner John Githongo has warned that in this setting, the NIFC “would be like a financial crime aircraft carrier, self-contained and able to cause considerable damage”.

We noted, too, the central role played by the Lord Mayor of the City of London Corporation and one of the City Corporation’s main lobbying bodies, TheCityUK. Now, via the Institute of Certified Public Accountants of Kenya, a new draft Nairobi International Financial Centre Bill, 2016, which we believe came out this month. Its preamble calls it:

“A BILL for an Act of Parliament to provide a framework to facilitate and support the development of an efficient and globally competitive financial services sector in Kenya . . “

Continue reading “Kenya tax haven approaching: secrecy to be enforced with prison terms”

Our June 2016 Podcast: Brexit, quantifying kleptocracy & why Panama Papers is tip of offshore iceberg

In our June 2016 Taxcast: how different could the lives of those in poverty have been without secrecy jurisdictions? We give you the very latest estimates on the missing trillions offshored from the world’s developing regions. Also: Brexit and the special interests behind it: “Nakedly, brazenly, they’re pushing the City of London’s deregulated, criminal approach to finance”. Plus, the Panama Papers shed some light on secretive, pro-tax haven US lobbying group the Center for Freedom and Prosperity’s funders.

“the revelations from the Panama Papers have been sensational but an international investigation with some kind of subpoena power would I think be 10 times as important.”

James Henry

Featuring: John Christensen of the Tax Justice Network, and Columbia University Professor, Economist, lawyer and Tax Justice Network senior advisor James Henry. Produced and presented by Naomi Fowler for the Tax Justice Network.

You can subscribe to our youtube channel or email Naomi [at] taxjustice.net to be added to the subscriber email list, or subscribe to the Taxcast on our rss feed. You can of course also also follow The Taxcast and the Tax Justice Network on twitter.

Download to listen offline here: http://traffic.libsyn.com/taxcast/Taxcast_June_16.mp3

And…join us on facebook https://www.facebook.com/TaxJusticeNetwork

Home websites: www.tackletaxhavens.com/taxcast www.taxjustice.net/taxcast

Brexit: the Tax Justice Network backs Remain

TJN square logo - NOV-2013

Brexit: The Tax Justice Network backs Remain

The Tax Justice Network, an independent international network focused on tax and tax havens, and not aligned to any political party, today came out in support of the Remain campaign in the UK referendum on EU membership.

In a statement released today, the Tax Justice Network said: Continue reading “Brexit: the Tax Justice Network backs Remain”

Finance Uncovered: new investigation into Rift Valley Railway

From Finance Uncovered, a TJN-supported journalism project:

“Today, De Correspondent (Netherlands), The Daily Reporter (Kenya), The Observer (Uganda) and MO (Belgium) have published an investigation into the Rift Valley Railway, the historic railroad connecting Kampala to the port of Mombasa. The investigation developed a project of Patrick Mayoyo, one of our members from Kenya and involved journalists from Belgium and the UK. 

In this article our team reveals that the World Bank has opened an inquiry into potential embezzlement of public funds after international development institutions invested over $140m into the line. We travel from Nairobi to Mombasa to find out why RVR has gone off the rails.”

  The section “Rift Valley goes offshore” is particularly useful for our purposes. Now read on.

More unfair tax treaties may be renegotiated

ugandaThis time it’s Uganda. From Martin Hearson:

“The government announced in its latest budget that it has finished formulating its new tax treaty policy, and will be renegotiating treaties that don’t comply. Seatini and ActionAid Uganda will no doubt chalk this up as a success.”

In Uganda, these two local NGOs have argued, apparently with good reason, that the country’s tax treaty network ‘is one of the mechanisms used by companies to avoid paying taxes, leading to illicit financial flows and tax losses for Uganda.’

Hearson also has a new working paper, co-authored with Jalia Kangave, entitled A Review of Uganda’s Tax Treaties and Recommendations for Action, whose summary states: Continue reading “More unfair tax treaties may be renegotiated”

Swiss whistleblower Rudolf Elmer: ‘they want to crucify me, as an example to other bankers’

Elmer (right) and the symbolic handover

Elmer (right) in a symbolic handover of data to Julian Assange

Rudolf Elmer, the Swiss whistleblower who has been pursued by Swiss courts for a decade and served over half a year in prison while accused of (according to Switzerland’s peculiar courts) violating the Swiss banking secrecy law, now faces two more court trials: one, on June 23rd, as part of the ongoing case for which he has already been in prison; and one on June 24th, relating to the symbolic handover of a data file to Julian Assange at the Frontline Club in London.

Journalists, save the date: June 23 and June 24. Though the Brexit vote will dominate media coverage around that time, don’t forget Elmer. 

In an email to TJN last week, Elmer said: Continue reading “Swiss whistleblower Rudolf Elmer: ‘they want to crucify me, as an example to other bankers’”

What might Brexit do for tax havens and tax justice?

Where to now, Jeeves?

Where to now, Jeeves?

The UK votes on Thursday in a referendum over leaving the European Union. While there are dynamics that play in different directions, such a ‘Brexit’ would almost certainly see the UK itself push further down the road of tax havenry, hurting its own citizens and causing wider global damage.

The tax injustice effects

The most obvious effect, in Britain, is illustrated by this quote from Rupert Murdoch, arguably Britain’s most influential media magnate, via the journalist Anthony Hilton.

Murdoch Continue reading “What might Brexit do for tax havens and tax justice?”

Are European Union finance ministers about to deliver another stitch-up on corporate tax?

Update 3, June 21. The EU Press Release is here. Scornful comments continue to circulate.

Update 2: This blog is turning into a series of updates in *italics*, with the original background discussion in plain text underneath. Currently, the situation is uncertain – two hours ago, Jeroen Dijsselbloem, the president of Ecofin, tweeted:

Jeroen Dijsselbloem ?@J_Dijsselbloem 2h
#ECOFIN hope for a deal on the #ATAD-discussions on Monday #EU2016NL

So things are not decided yet. Meanwhile, one of our commenters, watching this situation unfold, has added:

Note that the text of CFC rules has slightly changed compared to the text in the blog, the text “the taxpayer can establish that” have been deleted again. That only further weakens the already useless compromise text.

While the CFC rules against parking profits in tax havens have been watered down, the other BEPS elements have been sabotaged too.

The limitation of interest deductions was weak to start with, but member states can now delay implementation for five year, and existing loans used for profit shifting are exempt until they mature. Like Tove, Lotta and Sol already noted, some member states said they first want an OECD agreement that all OECD members have to implement this, but there is no initiative whatsoever to upgrade the argeed OECD BEPS “common approach” on limiting interest deductions to a “minimum standard”.

The rules against hybrid mismatches, which are situations where profits end up in between two countries and remain untaxed, were incomplete to start with. Although the OECD has clearly spelled out a common approach that can be applied unilaterally as well as bilaterally between any two countries, the proposed compromise only addresses mismatches between two EU countries. The EC will come with a proposal to address mismatches between an EU country and a third country later this year.

In short, EU ministers of finance have completely sabotaged three key OECD BEPS actions – however, it is still possible that after the weekend, it will turn out there is no deal yet.

For those interested, here is the link to all public statements by ministers of finance in the morning:

http://video.consilium.europa.eu/en/webcast/6ab6c51a-afdc-4a41-8192-0415600f1b7e

And here is the link to the press conference this afternoon:

http://video.consilium.europa.eu/en/webcast/2519ce6f-446f-4325-84d5-0c5e1b6a71c1

Update 1: June 17th. Another commentator on this continuing email thread: 

“The public debate on ATAD [the EU Anti Tax Avoidance Directive] is over for now, and ministers will try to reach final agreement on some of the outstanding issues. We expect them to reach an agreement later this afternoon. The press conference is scheduled for 16:30 CET and can be watched live here.”

Sol Picciotto, said, based on what is known so far:

“The whole package is now so weak that it is clear that governments want to continue their tax competition games, and are not serious about corporate taxation.”

Another email commentator:

“I hope everyone’s filling up their buckets of scorn, ready to be poured all over the outcome when it’s finally announced! It is pathetic, isn’t it.”

Original blog:

We’ve just received this, via email:

“Tomorrow, the EU Ministers of Finance will meet in the Ecofin Council in Luxembourg. Probably they will reach political agreement on the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive. Confirming . . . fears, the so-called CFC rules against parking profits in tax havens have been watered down to something completely useless. And I mean COMPLETELY useless.”

All this, on the eve of a possible “Brexit” referendum, fired ultimately by anger at an establishment consensus that is viewed as out of touch with ordinary people (read this brilliant short analysis on that). What a spectacular folly this tax move would turn out to be, if things unfold here as feared.  Continue reading “Are European Union finance ministers about to deliver another stitch-up on corporate tax?”

New paper: Taxing Multinational Enterprises as Unitary Firms

Prof. Sol Picciotto

Prof. Sol Picciotto

A new paper by TJN Senior Adviser Sol Picciotto, for the International Center for Tax and Development (ICTD). 

Summary:

This paper explores the issues raised for international tax rules of explicitly treating multinational enterprises (MNEs) as single or unitary firms. It first briefly explains why reform of international corporate taxation is important particularly for developing countries, then outlines the flaws in the current system.

It discusses the impetus created for reforms, and the political and institutional dynamics of the tax treaty system. An evaluation is provided of the results of the G20/OECD project on base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS), focusing essentially on the extent to which they moved towards a unitary approach, and the problems created by their continued adherence to the independent entity principle.

It then outlines several proposals which, in different ways, would apply a unitary approach to MNEs. The remainder of the paper focuses more particularly on one variant: unitary taxation with formulary apportionment – this was the focus of the ICTD’s research programme, which resulted in the outputs discussed here. It outlines the main findings on optimal design of an international formulary apportionment system, evaluates the evidence about its possible effects on national tax revenue, and considers the possibilities and prospects for adoption of such a system regionally.

It contains some devastating critiques of the OECD’s BEPS (“Base Erosion and Profit Shifting”) project to tackle corporate tax cheating, including, among many other things:

“The political mandate for the BEPS project was expressed in broad and simple terms. It called for a reform of international tax rules to ensure that firms could be taxed ‘where economic activities occur and value is created’ (OECD 2013: 4). However, it also insisted that ‘changes to international tax rules must be designed to address the gaps between different countries’ tax systems, while still respecting the sovereignty of each country to design its own rules’ (G20 2013: 4). These aims are contradictory. . . .  The conflict is exacerbated when a government decides that its tax system must be competitive in order to be business-friendly.”

So how have the contradictions been resolved?

“Instead of resolving the central issue by a principled agreement, the problems have been deferred to be decided on an ad hoc basis. The main beneficiaries are the specialists, particularly in transfer pricing, which has grown to be an enormous field of professional practice in the past thirty years. Their considerable investments in intellectual capital make it hard for most of them to envisage or accept a new approach, and the increased complexity will further enhance the value of their expertise. It will also create an even higher entry barrier for newcomers, particularly from the many developing countries that have introduced transfer pricing regulations only in the last five to ten years. Many aspiring professionals will no doubt relish this challenge, but if the rewards for some individuals are high, so is the social cost of devoting scarce skills to operating a defective system.”

What a triumph.

“A more effective solution, which would entail explicit abandonment of the independent entity principle and treating MNEs as unitary firms, would largely deprive them of this power to tweak national tax rules to try to attract investment by MNEs.”

Anyway, there is plenty more in here. Now read on.

Switzerland is handing back looted money. How big a deal is this?

"Are we Swiss all criminals?" The poster asks.

“Are we Swiss all criminals?” The poster asks.

In the context of a fun Twitter fight and finger-pointing between the Swiss Bankers’ Association and the German Finance Ministry, there’s a newish story on Quartz entitled Swiss bankers swear they are trying to help Africa get its dirty money back. It begins like this:

“It irritates Valentin Zellweger that ‘no longer than six minutes into any James Bond movie, a sleazy Swiss banker still appears.’ “

This is, of course, the story that Switzerland, which is still ranked top of our last Financial Secrecy Index, has not only made *some* improvements to its egregious and globe-harming secrecy regime, but it is engaged in a furious domestic and international public-relations exercise to try and distance itself from a deeply criminal past. Nobody should ever forget Swiss bankers’ efforts to use deception, fraud and other tricks to hang onto assets belonging to the families of Jews murdered by Hitler’s regime, before being dragged into making some amends by global outrage. And as if that weren’t bad enough, there’s oceans of other murderous and criminal stuff that we shouldn’t forget either.

Well, the Quartz article continues: Continue reading “Switzerland is handing back looted money. How big a deal is this?”

Guest article: transparency upside down

Jorge Gaggero

Jorge Gaggero

Jorge Gaggero, a long-time contributor to TJN, has written a guest article comparing Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) ranking with our Financial Secrecy Index. (Originally published at Revista Turba.)

One ranking is an upside-down version of the other. Those countries which look good on political corruption (the UK, the U.S., Singapore, Hong Kong) are actually among the worst providers of financial secrecy, according to the FSI.  

The article also points to a ‘fraternal’ alliance between the U.S. and the UK as key players in the offshore system, whose financial sector actors have been important protectors of the system.

Read Gaggero’s article here (only in Spanish).

Norway’s oil fund: a minor victory for tax ethics

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Norway oil fund*Big new update* under this guest blog. 

Norway’s Oil fund, which says it is worth $7.1 trillion Kroner last year (about US$860 billion at current exchange rates), is so important in world markets that a cottage industry of fund-watchers has sprung up. Several civil society bodies have sought to influence the fund, in particular to get it to invest in a more ethical and responsible way. Now Sigrid Klæboe Jacobsen, Director of Tax Justice Network – Norge, has written us a guest blog outlining a meaningful advance in this area.

Minor victory for tax ethics in the Norwegian Oilfund

On Monday the 30th May 2016 the Norwegian Parliament voted in favour of including tax ethics in the investments made by The Government Pension Fund Global (popularly called the Oilfund and managed by Norges Bank – NBIM). The Parliament has requested that the Oilfund produces an “expectation document” on tax for companies they invest in.

The good news is that this is the first time any measures in combatting tax havens and financial secrecy have been passed in relation to the Oilfund. The bad news is that the wording is very vague, so the “expectation document” might never see the light of day. Continue reading “Norway’s oil fund: a minor victory for tax ethics”

TJN sparring partner caught up in Panama Papers scandal

Center freedom prosperityBack in 2005 a lobby group in Washington, D.C. issued a press release entitled Tax Justice Network Sides with Europe’s Tax Collectors, Ignores Critical Role of Low-Tax Jurisdiction in Protecting Human Rights and Promoting Pro-Growth Policy.

The bizarre press release accused us of putting at risk the lives of “Jews in France, or homosexuals in Saudi Arabia” because . . . well, read the press release to get a flavour (and look at our generic responses to these kinds of things, here or here, for instance.)

The Center for Freedom and Prosperity (CFP, for it was they) were a tiny but influential organisation linked to the libertarian Cato Institute, which proved a key player in beating back the OECD’s so-called Harmful Tax Competition initiative to tackle tax havens, launched in 1998 to little effect.

Now the Washington Post is carrying an article entitled How an obscure nonprofit in Washington protects tax havens for the rich. And the nonprofit is, of course, our old friends the CFP.

Continue reading “TJN sparring partner caught up in Panama Papers scandal”