New report: is Apple paying less than 1% tax in the EU?

We’re pleased to share this new study commissioned by GUE/NGL members of the European Parliament’s TAX3 special committee on tax evasion, tax avoidance and money laundering. You can read more about their very important work here. The report was written by Emma Clancy and Martin Brehm Christensen and is titled: Exposed: Apple’s Golden Delicious Tax Deals: Is Ireland Helping Apple Pay Less Than 1% Tax In The EU?

As it points out, Apple is unlikely to be the only multinational company structured this way. Report co-author Emma Clancy highlights that only this month Microsoft has merged the two parts of its Double Irish structure, which is likely to indicate that Microsoft is now, or intends to, replicate the structure used by Apple. Continue reading “New report: is Apple paying less than 1% tax in the EU?”

Bermuda: inequality and poverty in UK Overseas Territory

We’re very pleased to share this important report on the British Overseas territory of Bermuda, written by Bermudian economist Robert Stubbs, formerly Head of Research for Bank of Bermuda. There are more details on him and his work at the end of this fascinating and timely report. which we reproduce in full below. We’ve interviewed him on the Taxcast, our monthly podcast/radio show which you can listen to here.

Historically Britain encouraged the Overseas Territories to develop their finance sectors, which interact with, and benefit the City of London’s finance sector in all kinds of ways. We’ve long argued that the UK has a responsibility towards its Overseas Territories, to support them to progress towards economic diversification and tax reforms necessary in order to address inequality and boost their economies. (Bermuda’s government is currently working on new proposals which they’ll publish and debate in August 2018). Continue reading “Bermuda: inequality and poverty in UK Overseas Territory”

UK overseas territories fight back against financial transparency measures

Ten years ago the Tax Justice Network was told it’d never happen, but recently British Members of Parliament voted to stop secret ownership of companies in British Overseas Territories. Unfortunately the Crown Dependencies were not included in the measure because, as we understand it, politicians were advised wrongly in our view, that such different constitutional arrangements apply to them as to require separate legislation.

As we pointed out in our response to this historic vote, the average secrecy score of those 7 UK Overseas Territories covered by our Financial Secrecy Index is 74%. That gives you an idea of the significant contribution their secrecy services make globally.

The UK brought in public registers of the real owners of companies in 2017. Enforcement and verification is a real problem in the UK as well as in its satellite havens, but it’s very important to understand that, as the Tax Justice Network’s CEO Alex Cobham says:

the UK’s financial secrecy network is the biggest in the world. While the UK itself is only moderately secretive according to our Financial Secrecy Index, this reflects the deliberate outsourcing of secrecy to the Crown Dependencies (Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man) and the more numerous Overseas Territories (OTs) such as the Cayman Islands, number 3 in our most recent Financial Secrecy Index, and the British Virgin Islands at number 16.”

Continue reading “UK overseas territories fight back against financial transparency measures”

Tax Justice Network’s Annual Conference 2018: livestream and schedule

 

The Tax Justice Network’s annual conference is taking place this Wednesday 13 June to Thursday 14 June in Lima, Peru. The conference, jointly hosted with FES and Latindadd, brings together campaigners, researchers, policy makers and tax experts from across the world to share the inspiring and vital work they are doing on tax justice.

Talks will cover a wide range of topics on tax justice from women’s rights to the challenges of tackling illicit financial flows. A live video stream of the conference and a schedule of each day’s talks is available below.

 

Saved livestreams

Final session

Sixth session

Fifth session

Fourth session

Third session

Second session

First session

 

Day 1 – Wednesday 13 June 2018

9:00am (2:00pm GMT) – Welcome and introductions

9:30am – 11am (2:30pm – 4:00pm GMT) – Inequalities and tax justice

11:30am – 1:00pm (4:30pm – 6:00pm GMT) – Parallel sessions:

Tax justice: Theoretical inquiries

Tax breaks and the race to the bottom

2:00pm – 3:30pm (7:00pm – 8:30pm GMT) – Parallel sessions:

Tax justice challenges of inequalities

Hiding individual wealth: Old and new challenges

4:00pm – 5:30pm (9pm – 10:30pm GMT) – Tax justice and women’s rights

 

Day 2 – Thursday 14 June 2018

9:00am – 10:30am (2:00pm – 3:30pm GMT) – Taxation and gender: Perspectives from Colombia, Ecuador, Uruguay, Bolivia and Venezuela

11:00am – 12:30pm (4:00pm – 5:30pm GMT) – Parallel sessions:

El aporte fiscal de la minería y comentarios sobre la erosión de la base gravable y traslado de beneficios en la industria extractive

Trade and tax injustices

2:00pm – 3:00pm (7:00pm – 8:00pm GMT) – Parallel sessions:

Money-laundering: Spotlight on Kenya

Illicit financial flows: Estimates and case studies

3:30pm – 5:00pm (8:30pm – 10:00pm GMT) – International analyses of tax justice

Will the EU really blacklist the United States?

In our latest Financial Secrecy Index assessment, the United States moved up to second place. With its now unparalleled commitment to secrecy at scale, and its influence on international reforms, it has become the leading driver of tax abuse and corruption risk around the world.

Years ago we called on the European Union to impose a withholding tax against jurisdictions that don’t meet the emerging global standards of tax transparency – starting with the United States. As the Tax Justice Network’s John Christensen said at the time,

While rightly demanding greater transparency from others, the USA has established itself as the fastest-growing provider of tax haven secrecy – and only the EU has the power to act. Otherwise we risk seeing a world where only the richest and most powerful country can protect its tax system from offshore abuse, while EU countries – not to mention developing countries – pay the price.”

Continue reading “Will the EU really blacklist the United States?”

Tax Justice Network’s June 2018 Spanish language podcast: Justicia ImPositiva, nuestro podcast, junio 2018

Welcome to this month’s latest podcast and radio programme in Spanish with Marcelo Justo and Marta Nuñez, free to download and broadcast on radio networks across Latin America and Spain. ¡Bienvenidos y bienvenidas a nuestro podcast y programa radiofónica! (abajo en Castellano).

In this month’s programme:

Continue reading “Tax Justice Network’s June 2018 Spanish language podcast: Justicia ImPositiva, nuestro podcast, junio 2018”

New report: extreme poverty and human rights in the United States

The United Nations Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights Professor Philip Alston has recently released the results of his fact-finding mission to the United States, also ranked number 2 in our Financial Secrecy Index. You can read Professor Alston’s full report here.

As part of our exploration of President Trump’s tax reforms and the killing of the American Dream in our monthly podcast and radio show The Taxcast earlier this year, which you can listen to here, Professor Alston told us:

“There is no doubt in my mind that tax policy is human rights policy in so many different ways, what’s in any country’s fiscal policy determines what sort of resources are going to be available for human rights of all types. What has got to happen in the US is a change in the mentality…the political process is functioning increasingly just to appeal to the wealthy. That is contrary to all of the assumptions I would say that are in the US constitution and that the Americans hold dear.”

Continue reading “New report: extreme poverty and human rights in the United States”

Edition 5 of the Tax Justice Network Arabic monthly podcast/radio show الجباية ببساطة

Here’s the fifth edition of our new monthly Arabic podcast/radio show Taxes Simply الجباية ببساطة contributing to tax justice public debate around the world. (In Arabic below) Taxes Simply الجباية ببساطة is produced and presented by Walid Ben Rhouma and Osama Diab of the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights, also an investigative journalist. The programme is available for listeners to download and it’s also available for free to any radio stations who would like to broadcast it. You can also join the programme on Facebook and on Twitter.

In the fifth issue of الجباية ببساطة (Taxes Simply) we start with a summary of May’s tax news from around the Arab region and the world. Plus:
Continue reading “Edition 5 of the Tax Justice Network Arabic monthly podcast/radio show الجباية ببساطة”

Why we can’t afford the rich: our May 2018 podcast

In this month’s Taxcast: We discuss why we can’t afford the rich and challenge ideas about wealth, entrepreneurialism and investment.

Also: ten years ago the Tax Justice Network was told it’d never happen, but this month British Members of Parliament voted to stop secret ownership of companies in British Overseas Territories. The Crown Dependencies got away for now. But the pressure is on them as a UK Foreign Affairs Committee report says corrupt assets of Kremlin-connected individuals pouring in to London is a threat to the UK’s national security.

And while some of the money hidden in the Overseas Territories may flow to the United States, the EU may actually add it to their blacklist of non-cooperative jurisdictions…

Featuring: Lancaster University’s Professor of Social Theory and Political Economy Andrew Sayer (author of the book Why We Can’t Afford the Rich) and John Christensen of the Tax Justice Network. Produced and presented by Naomi Fowler of the Tax Justice Network.

being an investor sounds good, doesn’t it, who wouldn’t want to be an investor, sounds like kind of a benefactor but actually in practice a lot of investment, possibly a majority of investment is purely extractive…And in our economy the asset rich have become richer at the expense of the asset poor, people who own very little”

~ Professor Andrew Sayer

Continue reading “Why we can’t afford the rich: our May 2018 podcast”

Guest blog: Depositors disciplining banks. What’s the impact of scandals?

We’re pleased to share this guest blog from Mikael Homanen, a PhD Candidate at the Faculty of Finance at Cass Business School in the UK.

Can depositor (or customer) activism make a real difference? New research presented at the Chicago Booth Stigler Center suggests that banks see significant decreases in deposit growth after experiencing tax evasion, corruption and environmental scandals.

The banking sector has been regarded as a major contributor of financing for the real economy and therefore a crucial value-adding mechanism for the financial system. In the recent decade, however, the banking sector has been under scrutiny. Banks have been identified as some of the largest enablers of the $21 trillion to $32 trillion of private financial wealth invested in tax havens. In addition, banks continue financing major coal and carbon-intensive projects that undermine the Paris Agreement’s aim of limiting global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. Can depositors make a difference?

Continue reading “Guest blog: Depositors disciplining banks. What’s the impact of scandals?”

Guest blog: Illicit Financial Flows: Damaging the foundations of justice

We’re very pleased to share the views of Sakshi Rai, the Programme Consultant at the Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA) in New Delhi. In this guest blog Sakshi Rai introduces two new explainer briefs:

The problem of illicit financial flows poses the greatest development challenge in present times.

Illicit finance is generated through both national and international illicit activities and markets impacting the sovereign ability of states to make coherent and responsive policies. As they are hidden, illicit financial flows easily enter licit financial circles using loopholes in national laws and the sophisticated network of professionals known as gatekeepers and enablers facilitated by the opacity in the international financial system. The loss in revenue through illicit financial flows is damaging to the very foundation and ethos of justice.

The Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability and the Financial Transparency Coalition have published two primers on Illicit Financial Flows and Automatic Exchange of Information from the perspective and experiences of developing countries with the aim of demystifying these issues for a wider audience. In this series, CBGA will also bring out primers on beneficial ownership and country by country reporting. Continue reading “Guest blog: Illicit Financial Flows: Damaging the foundations of justice”

Addressing profit shifting in the mining sector through excessive interest deductions: our advice

The Tax Justice Network has responded to the following call by the OECD’s Centre for Tax Policy and the Intergovernmental Forum on Mining, Minerals, Metals and Sustainable Development:

For many resource-rich developing countries, mineral resources present an unparalleled economic opportunity to increase government revenue. Tax base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS), combined with gaps in the capabilities of tax authorities in developing countries, threaten this prospect. One of the avenues for international profit shifting by multinational enterprises is the use of excessive interest deductions.

Building on BEPS Action 4, this practice note has been prepared by the OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration under a programme of co-operation with the Intergovernmental Forum on Mining, Minerals, Metals and Sustainable Development (IGF), to help guide tax officials on how to strengthen their defences against BEPS. It is part of wider efforts to address some of the challenges developing countries are facing in raising revenue from their mining sectors. This work also complements action by the Platform for Collaboration on Tax and others to produce toolkits on top priority tax issues facing developing countries.”

Continue reading “Addressing profit shifting in the mining sector through excessive interest deductions: our advice”

West Africa Leaks project exposes new offshore scandals

In a new investigation published today, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists has teamed up with 13 journalists to trawl though the Panama Papers and Paradise Papers to find untold stories of wealth extraction in West Africa. The outcome is being promoted under the hashtag #westafricaleaks.

Journalists working with the ICIJ have uncovered an impressive number of stories, ranging from an offshore foundation owned by an old friend of the President of Liberia, a shadowy New Zealand company that won a contract to build a non-existent slaughterhouse in Niger, and the offshore dealings of a well known arms trafficker in Chad.

From a tax justice point of view, we hope that the new revelations will force some action from governments and the international community in putting more effort into tackling illicit financial flows in Africa. According to Will Fitzgibbon, who led on the project, although hundreds of million in back taxes have been collected by European governments as a result of the ICIJ’s offshore leaks, there is no evidence that any African government has been able to recover any additional revenues whatsoever as a result of the Paradise Papers and the Panama Papers.

It is a complaint that we hear regularly from revenue officials and anti-corruption investigators from across the continent, that governments have a policy of de-funding investigatory agencies to protect the interests of powerful individuals. But of course it’s also true that the incredible global progress made towards our ABC of tax transparency has systematically excluded lower-income countries so far.

There are also issues around the public perception of the value in taxation.

Ousmane Sonko, a former Senegalese tax inspector who is now a member of parliament, is quoted by the ICIJ as saying:

“When people don’t even understand what taxes are, acting on something like the Paradise Papers is challenging,”

Greater tax revenues are absolutely fundamental to driving economic development and better health and educational outcomes for people in Africa. We hope that the continued work of teams of investigators like the ICIJ will spur the political momentum required to focus the minds of both African governments and the international community to improve tax systems across the continent.

All the stories on the West Africa leaks are available on the ICIJ website, where you can also read about how the investigation was put together, and meet some of the journalists behind the project.

M5S – Lega Nord tax plans would be a disaster for Italy

The leader of Italy’s far right Lega Nord has described the potential coalition with the populist five star movement (M5S) as a ‘bomb’ for Italy’s political establishment. It certainly will be a bomb for tax justice, Italy’s public services and economic and social equality in Italy.

Two of the main economic policies being proposed by the two sides of this deal are a universal basic income (UBI) from M5S and a flat tax of 20% from the Lega. Italy’s top rate of income tax is 43% today, and it has a 24% corporation tax with an additional local tax of around 3-5%.

There is every indication that if the coalition manages to get off the ground (and that is still a significant if), then the government will attempt to implement both policies. As a package this would be a disaster for Italy, with the M5S seemingly prepared to trade a small and limited UBI for a tax policy that will promote vast economic inequality and threaten to destroy the country’s public finances.

The flat tax

Many who promote flat taxes argue that they are a win-win. Citizens pay lower tax rates, but the simplicity of the system makes avoidance and evasion more difficult and taxes easier to collect. This, together with an economic boost generated by the policy makes up for any losses in income from the lowering of tax rates, they argue.

However, years of experience with flat taxes in eastern Europe tells us that this is a con. Tax cuts on corporations and the wealthy inevitably lead to less taxes collected from corporations and the wealthy. If government spending is to be maintained, that revenue needs to come from somewhere. In eastern Europe, those revenues come from higher taxes on consumption, like VAT, or higher taxes on labour, such as though social security contributions.

What we end up with, is a regressive tax system, redistributing wealth upwards, from the poor to the rich.

This is no doubt why Latvia, one of the first countries to adopt a flat tax in 1995, is now abandoning the policy and introducing a system of progressive taxation.

Initial analysis of the proposals being considered by the M5S-Lega Nord coalition demonstrate that what we know about the real world experience of flat taxes in eastern Europe is true in Italy – in spades.

The benefits would accrue overwhelmingly to the rich, and the poor could end up paying even more in taxes through the loss of tax rebates that the flat tax would entail. An analysis by Italy’s Il Sole 24 Ore shows how a three person family with a child over 3 years of age, with single earner bringing home 15,000 Euro or less a year, would see a staggering 127% increase in their tax bill.  The same family on 100,000 would see a tax cut of 45%.

The Lega Nord have said there would be safeguards in their flat tax to prevent people facing tax rises, but these have not been detailed.  Even if lower income families in the end are no worse off than before, the distributional impacts are clear. Single earners earning 15,000 Euro or less would see a tax cut of 5%, or an extra 85 Euro a year non a 20% tax rate. Those on 100,000 Euro would get an extra 16,000 Euro in their pocket. There are more than 18m tax payers in Italy, 45% of the total, who declare a yearly income of 15,000 Euro or less.

Who pays?

Estimates of the cost to government revenues of the flat proposals are between 50-80bn Euro. In addition, the M5S universal basic income would cost an additional 17bn Euro.

Where will the money come from? To generate an extra 100bn Euro in tax receipts from VAT rates would have to double.

A VAT rate of 40%+ is of course out of the question, and in any event both parties opposed to any rise in VAT. For now, the coalition appears to be indulging the fantasy that someone else will pay for their policies. A leaked copy of the draft coalition agreement between Lega Nord and the M5S includes the idea of asking the EU to forgive 250bn Euro in debt, and asking for a EU contribution to their universal basic income policy. I think we all know what the answer to that will be.

The reality is that these tax giveaways to the rich will need to be funded by massive cuts to public services, social welfare cuts and selling off public assets. Again, all hugely regressive policies which are likely to hit the poor even further.

The leader of the M5S has said that any coalition deal will be put to an online vote of the movement’s members. Lets hope for everyone’s sake that they reject any deal which threatens to put a bomb under the Italian economy.

Picture Credit – Palazzo Montecitorio by Simone Ramella on Flickr, used under the Creative Commons License

#LuxLeaks verdict: hope for whistleblowers as Antoine Deltour is acquitted

We’ve always said that the #LuxLeaks whistleblowers Antoine Deltour, Raphaël Halet and investigative journalist Edouard Perrin should never have been charged because the disclosures they were involved in were so obviously in the public interest, helping to expose the industrial scale on which Luxembourg tax authorities were rubber-stamping corporate tax dodging schemes and draining huge amounts of revenue from the public coffers of other countries. The spotlight must also focus on accountancy firm PwC for their role in all this as well as for the disgraceful way they treated these whistleblowers – you can read about the less known, but truly shocking treatment of whistleblower Raphaël Halet in detail here.

After some disappointing twists and turns, today we have a positive court verdict in the case against Antoine Deltour which we hope will make authorities in other jurisdictions think twice about taking action against whistleblowers in the future. We also are very aware that the court process continues for journalist Edouard Perrin and for whistleblower Raphaël Halet. Once again we want to thank all three of them for their actions and we await the outcomes which we hope will match up to today’s ruling in relation to Antoine Deltour. In the meantime here’s the statement from Antoine Deltour’s support committee: Continue reading “#LuxLeaks verdict: hope for whistleblowers as Antoine Deltour is acquitted”

Our May 2018 Spanish language podcast: Justicia ImPositiva, nuestro podcast, mayo 2018

Welcome to this month’s latest podcast and radio programme in Spanish with Marcelo Justo and Marta Nuñez, downloaded and broadcast on radio networks across Latin America and Spain. ¡Bienvenidos y bienvenidas a nuestro podcast y programa radiofónica! (abajo en Castellano).

In this month’s programme:

Continue reading “Our May 2018 Spanish language podcast: Justicia ImPositiva, nuestro podcast, mayo 2018”

Unhappy meal: tax avoidance still on the menu at McDonald’s

We’re sharing this press release from EPSU, the European Public Service Union which comprises 8 million public service workers from over 265 trade unions. Here’s their joint statement on their new research on McDonald’s, entitled Unhappy Meal report.

Today we release a new report on McDonald’s tax practices, focusing on the company’s use of tax avoidance mechanisms in Europe and low-tax and secrecy jurisdictions around the world. It shows how in the midst of a tax probe and the day after the Brexit, McDonald’s changed its tax structure.

In February 2015, our coalition of European and American trade unions unveiled a report about McDonald’s deliberate avoidance of over €1 billion in corporate taxes in Europe (from 2009 to 2013). Continue reading “Unhappy meal: tax avoidance still on the menu at McDonald’s”

TJN annual conference: Full programme and registration

We’re delighted to present the full programme for the Tax Justice Network’s annual conference – available to download now. The conference, jointly hosted this year with FES and Latindadd, in Lima on 13-14 June, will take place with Spanish, Portuguese and English interpreters. Registration is still open, and we’re expecting a fantastic coming together of the tax justice movement’s activists and experts from across the region and the wider world. Continue reading “TJN annual conference: Full programme and registration”

TJN annual conference #tjn18: Full programme and registration

We’re delighted to present the full programme for the Tax Justice Network’s annual conference – available to download now. The conference, jointly hosted this year with FES and Latindadd, in Lima on 13-14 June, will take place with Spanish, Portuguese and English interpreters. Registration is still open, and we’re expecting a fantastic coming together of the tax justice movement’s activists and experts from across the region and the wider world. Continue reading “TJN annual conference #tjn18: Full programme and registration”

COFFERS tax course: Register now

We’re delighted to announce that registration is now open for a short course in tax at the Copenhagen Business School, being run as part of the COFFERS project (Combating Financial Fraud and Empowering Regulators).

The programme runs from 12-14 September 2018. It features many of the leading international tax researchers who participate in COFFERS, and is designed to provide a practical overview of a wide range of international tax questions. In addition to the sessions outlined below, there will be a number of additional keynote speakers. Continue reading “COFFERS tax course: Register now”

Guest blog: Tax incentives – common ground between business and civil society?

Tax incentives – common ground between business and civil society

By Oliver Pearce, Oxfam Tax Policy Advisor

Tax is a highly contested issue, but there is more common ground than might be thought. A new paper published by the Confederation of British Business (CBI) and development NGOs Action Aid, Christian Aid and Oxfam outlines overlapping perspectives on when and how tax incentives should be provided by governments in the global south.

Of course, businesses and NGOs approach tax incentives from slightly different perspectives. But we firmly agree that better tax policymaking by developing country governments would lead to a better deal for both business and the world’s poorest people. Tax incentives are not universally bad. But they need to be well-designed, in order to help achieve a country’s long-term ambitions and to support sustainable and inclusive economic growth. Businesses and civil society want to see tax incentives offered only when there is clear economic and social need to build a lasting presence in a country, which will contribute to prosperity long after the initial project or investment. Continue reading “Guest blog: Tax incentives – common ground between business and civil society?”

Video discussion: ‘Taming Digital Capitalism’ through public country by country reporting

There were some important debates in Brussels recently where Hans Böckler Stiftung held a two-day symposium with the European Trade Union Institute looking at the changes citizens in Europe are facing in the workplace and examining the challenges for the new leaders who will be in place as a result of the May 2019 EU elections. As the Hans Böckler Foundation says,

Those elections will determine what chance we stand of continuing to develop a Social Europe fit to live in, with positive prospects for jobs and companies, or whether we shall be stuck with the task of defending Europe against its proliferating crew of political enemies.”

Continue reading “Video discussion: ‘Taming Digital Capitalism’ through public country by country reporting”