
From Michael West, an Australian tax journalist:
“In Australia, Part 4a of the Tax Act deems that the principal purpose of a transaction should be commercial (rather than tax driven). In light of the proliferation of tax haven activities by Australian companies this law, Part 4a, must be the most highly disregarded and disobeyed law in the nation, perhaps only topped by traffic offences.”
It’s an interesting story, not least because it has unearthed a hard-to-get number that we haven’t, from memory, seen before:
“The IPO documents for Intertrust estimate in 2014 the “total value of the global trust and corporate services market … was estimated at approximately €5.6 billion in revenue.”
Trust and corporate services can be legitimate but there is a large market for the sorts of (frequently nefarious) things offered by the likes of Mossack Fonseca, of Panama Papers fame. The $5.6 billion figure is vague as to what that number means, and which players it considers, but there it is, for what it’s worth. The only other statistic we’ve seen along these lines is from the Financial Times:
“Mr Fonseca described his company as a big player in a highly competitive niche industry but that his global market share was only 5 per cent.”
(Which of course raises the question of how large their revenues are.)
Now read on.
Related articles

New Tax Justice Network reports on real estate transparency
Beneficial Ownership of Real Estate Around the World
7 July 2026
Integrating the Collection, Use and Exchange of Real Estate Ownership Information
7 July 2026

Introducing the Real Estate Secrecy Index

Indicator deep dive: Golden Visas

She cleans your house but the tax system can’t see her

Finally, the European Court of Justice cracks down on trusts
Joint submission: International financial architecture, debt and the right to education
20 May 2026

Financial secrecy has entered the EU AML rulebook. What comes next?



WHY IS THE AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE INCAPABLE OF APPLYING A TAX ON TURNOVER RATE, IF PRESENT COMPLIANT MEASURES ARE “NOT” RETURNING TO THE AUSTRALIAN ECONOMY, THE APPROPRIATE ECONOMIC MATHEMATICS, REQUIRED TO CONDUCT THE OPERATING BUSINESS COST WITH PROFIT, – TO AND FOR, – THIS NATION OF AUSTRALIA ? ? ?
Comments are closed.