Nick Shaxson ■ Who ultimately pays the corporate income tax? (Again.)
We have written many times about the ‘incidence’ (or, if you like) burden of the corporate income tax. When you tax corporations, who ultimately pays it: the workers, through lower wages? The consumers, through higher prices? Or is it the shareholders and owners of capital?
It’s a crucial question. Defenders of wealth and entrenched privilege love to argue that it’s ‘workers’ who ultimately pay the tax: if they can persuade people that that is true then they can argue that it’s a pointless, regressive tax and should just be abolished. It’s often accompanied by sniggering about ‘lefties’ hitting the wrong targets and confidently delivered statements like “most economists agree that the burden falls on workers.”
We have long argued – and pointed to copious quantities of evidence – that it is largely the shareholders and owners of capital who ultimately pay the corporate income tax. (The most fun example illustrating this may be this one, but for a more comprehensive set of arguments see our document Ten Reasons to Defend the Corporate Income Tax.)
“Most relevant evidence suggests that the corporate tax falls largely on capital or shareholders, but even if one assigns a fraction of the burden of the corporate tax to workers, it is still a more progressive tax instrument than other major sources of revenue, including the individual income tax, the payroll tax, and the VAT.”
She writes in more detail on the incidence question here (“a review of the prior empirical work in this area fails to reveal persuasive empirical evidence of adverse effects on labor,” 2012) and here “there is no robust evidence that corporate tax burdens have large depressing effects on wages.” She provides a range of reasons why previous studies in this area may have got it wrong.
And now let’s ask: if the corporate income tax burden falls on shareholders, then who are those shareholders? Is it you and me (or ‘workers), via our pension funds? Well, there’s a bit of that. But here’s an interesting graphic, from our corporate tax document:
This is of course a rather US-focused blog, but the same essential conclusions will apply in many other countries. As Clausing notes, at the end of the day it’s rich people who pay the corporate income tax. It’s a tax to fight for.
For a fuller set of arguments about why the ‘incidence’ of corporate income taxes tends to fall on shareholders rather than workers (particularly for larger countries) then see Section 3.2 on page 7 here. See our earlier articles on this here.
On a separate but somewhat related matter, this fine article by John Kay in the Financial Times backs up a lot of what we’ve written about company shareholders, including the fact that company directors have no fidicuary duty to their shareholders forcing them to engage in tax avoidance.
Tax and racial justice: the Tax Justice Network podcast, the Taxcast
Switzerland – Submission to the UN Committee for the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women
20 September 2022
Tax as a tool for racial justice: new report launched
September 2022 Spanish language tax justice podcast, Justicia ImPositiva: La constitución Chilena, Crimen Organizado, el nuevo contexto global de EE UU
Tax haven Ireland to face UN spotlight over child rights impacts of fiscal policies
Tax Justice Network Arabic podcast #57: أزمة الديون المصرية والخصخصة المتسرعة
Tax Justice Network’s French podcast: La justice fiscale s’impose, même dans le cadre de l’Aide Publique au Développement #43
Ireland’s responsibility for the impacts of cross-border tax abuse on the realisation of children’s rights (2nd UN submission)
22 August 2022