
From a book called The Opium Wars, one of Britain’s less honourable (to put it mildly) historical escapades, a statement that was prompted by moves in Britain towards stopping the opium trade:
“Her Majesty’s government should do nothing to place in peril our opium revenues. As for preventing the manufacturing of opium, and the sale of it in China, that is far beyond your power.”
– Lord Ellenborough, 1843
Do those arguments sound familiar?
Doubtless they were wielded in the name of ‘competitiveness,’ or its equivalent at the time. Around the time, some ten percent of Britain’s revenues came from the opium trade – and, needless to say, the British government capitulated to the opium traffickers.
Related articles

UN tax convention hub – updates & resources

From data to policy: Building Africa’s evidence ecosystem for better tax reform

New IMF AML Guidance pushes for beneficial ownership transparency and tackles risks from major financial centres

When measurement is political: Accounting for natural resources and the true location of sales under unitary taxation
A 500-billion-dollar decision for the world: the revenue impacts of global unitary taxation
2 August 2026
Detecting Profit Shifting in Administrative Data: A South African Perspective
28 July 2026

A heartfelt farewell to our dear Óscar

Public finance is feminist terrain

New Tax Justice Network reports on real estate transparency
Beneficial Ownership of Real Estate Around the World
7 July 2026
Integrating the Collection, Use and Exchange of Real Estate Ownership Information
7 July 2026
