
From a book called The Opium Wars, one of Britain’s less honourable (to put it mildly) historical escapades, a statement that was prompted by moves in Britain towards stopping the opium trade:
“Her Majesty’s government should do nothing to place in peril our opium revenues. As for preventing the manufacturing of opium, and the sale of it in China, that is far beyond your power.”
– Lord Ellenborough, 1843
Do those arguments sound familiar?
Doubtless they were wielded in the name of ‘competitiveness,’ or its equivalent at the time. Around the time, some ten percent of Britain’s revenues came from the opium trade – and, needless to say, the British government capitulated to the opium traffickers.
Related articles

UN tax convention hub – updates & resources

New Tax Justice Network reports on real estate transparency
Beneficial Ownership of Real Estate Around the World
7 July 2026
Integrating the Collection, Use and Exchange of Real Estate Ownership Information
7 July 2026

Four definitions to change the world: Struggles over meaning in the UN tax convention negotiations

Fiscal hell or mirage? What Spain’s wage debate gets wrong

Introducing the Real Estate Secrecy Index

Indicator deep dive: Golden Visas

The European Court of Human Rights has upheld the weaponisation of privacy to restrict tax authorities’ access to banking data

She cleans your house but the tax system can’t see her

