
Nick Shaxson ■ Fact of the day: how often has Britain’s ‘non-dom’ rule been challenged?

Britain’s domicile rule is one of the greatest tools available to the world’s wealthiest people to shake of the pesky burden of tax, leaving the rest of us to kindly pay their share for them. It’s a slippery, vague concept, and lots of people who claim domicile status really ought not to be able to. With this short background, here’s our factoid of the day, courtesy of UK barrister Jolyon Maugham:
“In the last ten years (which is as far back as I checked), there’s only been one concluded challenge to domicile, nine years ago. There’s also a single indication of a challenge to come.”
Goodness. Coming in the wake of the HSBC scandal, which shows a resolute determination on the part of the government not to do anything to inconvenience the world’s wealthiest people, this is quite a shocker.
Related articles

Vulnerabilities to illicit financial flows: complementing national risk assessments

A tax justice lens on Palestine

New article explores why the fight for beneficial ownership transparency isn’t over
UN Submission: A Roadmap for Eradicating Poverty Beyond Growth
A human rights economy: what it is and why we need it

Strengthening Africa’s tax governance: reflections on the Lusaka country by country reporting workshop

Do it like a tax haven: deny 24,000 children an education to send 2 to school

Urgent call to action: UN Member States must step up with financial contributions to advance the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation

Incorporate Gender-Transformative Provisions into the UN Tax Convention
Asset beneficial ownership – Enforcing wealth tax & other positive spillover effects
4 March 2025