
Britain’s domicile rule is one of the greatest tools available to the world’s wealthiest people to shake of the pesky burden of tax, leaving the rest of us to kindly pay their share for them. It’s a slippery, vague concept, and lots of people who claim domicile status really ought not to be able to. With this short background, here’s our factoid of the day, courtesy of UK barrister Jolyon Maugham:
“In the last ten years (which is as far back as I checked), there’s only been one concluded challenge to domicile, nine years ago. There’s also a single indication of a challenge to come.”
Goodness. Coming in the wake of the HSBC scandal, which shows a resolute determination on the part of the government not to do anything to inconvenience the world’s wealthiest people, this is quite a shocker.
Related articles

🔴UN tax convention hub – updates & resources

When measurement is political: Accounting for natural resources and the true location of sales under unitary taxation
A 500-billion-dollar decision for the world: the revenue impacts of global unitary taxation
2 August 2026
Detecting Profit Shifting in Administrative Data: A South African Perspective
28 July 2026

A heartfelt farewell to our dear Óscar

Public finance is feminist terrain

New Tax Justice Network reports on real estate transparency
Beneficial Ownership of Real Estate Around the World
7 July 2026
Integrating the Collection, Use and Exchange of Real Estate Ownership Information
7 July 2026

Four definitions to change the world: Struggles over meaning in the UN tax convention negotiations


