
From Robert Goulder of Tax Analysts, in the wake of the Luxleaks scandal involving the exposure by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) of large numbers of secret Luxembourg tax deals for multinationals, a reminder that Luxembourg isn’t alone in its secrecy:
“The IRS [the U.S. Internal Revenue Services] still operates a secretive process whereby multinationals can negotiate bespoke transfer pricing outcomes. They are called advance pricing agreements, and they have never been publicly disclosed since the program’s inception in the early 1990s. Once they’ve finished busting on Luxembourg, maybe the good folks at the ICIJ can try to crack that nut.”
Now he’s not saying that Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) are in themselves a bad thing. But his comment about disclosure is spot on.
Related articles

UN tax convention hub – updates & resources

The European Court of Human Rights has upheld the weaponisation of privacy to restrict tax authorities’ access to banking data

She cleans your house but the tax system can’t see her

What we learned from three years of conversations on poverty beyond growth
Q&A on California’s proposed legislation on Worldwide Combined Reporting (WWCR)
27 May 2026

California steps up for tax fairness

Finally, the European Court of Justice cracks down on trusts
Joint submission: International financial architecture, debt and the right to education
20 May 2026

Financial secrecy has entered the EU AML rulebook. What comes next?

UN Tax Convention: Summary of the Tax Justice Network’s stakeholder input after the Fourth Session of negotiations

