[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
From Citizens for Tax Justice in the U.S., a post that begins by discussing federal tax breaks for manufacturing corporations. And they ask:
“Tobacco companies “manufacture” cigarettes—but do Americans, or lawmakers, really think it’s a good idea for the federal government to subsidise this activity? New financial reports from major corporations in this sector show that cigarette makers are enjoying substantial manufacturing tax breaks for producing products that kill people.”
It notes that Altria, the maker of Marlboros, cut its federal taxes by $799m over the past years just by using that deduction. (Also see work of our friends at the U.S. Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids.)
We’d add that Article 6 of the World Health Organisation’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control is clear on the importance of tobacco tax, and this reflects scientific and political consensus on the extreme ativan health costs – that is to say, deaths and lung cancer and other nasties – of not getting it right. Not taxing tobacco consumption sufficiently is one thing: subsidising production (of death) through the manufacturing deduction goes still further in the wrong direction.
This can only be seen as reflecting either very short and myopic policymaker horizons (trading what may or may not produce a job today, for a sure-fire slew of painful deaths tomorrow); or the continuing political power and influence of Big Tobacco: as the WHO puts it: the Tobacco industry is part of the problem, not of the solution. CTJ continue:
“At a minimum, policymakers should be asking whether it makes any sense to subsidize an industry producing products that kill thousands of Americans a year.”
And it’s not just Americans. It’s everyone.
Oh, and there’s this.
And this too.
[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_js]
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
[/vc_raw_js][/vc_column][/vc_row]
Related articles

UN tax convention hub – updates & resources
Report of the Fifth Session of negotiations on the UN tax convention
4 September 2026
Submission to Workstream I on Co-Lead’s Zero Draft of UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation (post-Fifth Session)
28 August 2026
Submission to Workstream II on Taxation of Income from Cross-Border Services (post-Fifth Session)
26 August 2026
Strengthening public resource mobilization through tax justice
25 August 2026
Submission to Workstream III on Dispute Prevention and Resolution (post-Fifth Session)
24 August 2026

From data to policy: Building Africa’s evidence ecosystem for better tax reform

New IMF AML Guidance pushes for beneficial ownership transparency and tackles risks from major financial centres

When measurement is political: Accounting for natural resources and the true location of sales under unitary taxation
A 500-billion-dollar decision for the world: the revenue impacts of global unitary taxation
2 August 2026
Detecting Profit Shifting in Administrative Data: A South African Perspective
28 July 2026

