
Last October we published an article entitled The UK’s “Patent Box” – nasty, disingenuous and hypocritical tax law (via a longer piece we wrote on Naked Capitalism, entitled The “Patent Box” – Proof That the UK is a Rogue State in Corporate Tax.) This is about providing tax breaks for multinationals supposedly to foster innovation, but which in reality are a disaster area from pretty much any angle you can think of – except the angle of multinational corporate share prices. For that reason, of course, a bunch of lobbyists in the U.S. are desperate to introduce one over there.
Now, we’re heartened to see this in the Wall St. Journal (hat tip: Clark Gascoigne):
“The top White House economic adviser [Jason Furman] threw cold water on a key feature of Republican international tax plans. . . Mr. Furman criticized what’s known as an “innovation box,” calling it an inefficient way to encourage corporate research and the associated jobs. An innovation box, mirroring tax regimes in the U.K. and the Netherlands, would apply a reduced tax rate that would apply to income from patents and other intellectual property housed in the U.S.”
And here’s the quote of the day:
“An innovation box is an economically inefficient way to provide an incentive for innovation,” Mr. Furman said in a meeting with Wall Street Journal reporters and editors. “A lot of the tax incentive is for research that has already happened, and it’s hard to get more research five years ago by giving it a tax break today. And a second thing is a lot of the tax incentive goes to people that are luckier, and you don’t control luck, and so you don’t get more luck when you have more of a tax incentive for it.”
In other words, it’s an idiotic idea. And in general terms corporate tax avoidance is, as TJN Senior Adviser David Quentin put it:
“like refined sugar in the human body – empty financial calories with adverse long-term health effects.”
Innovation boxes and patent boxes are ultimately anti-innovation.
Related articles

UN tax convention hub – updates & resources

UN Framework Convention – Roundup of the Fifth Session of Negotiations
Notes on the UN tax convention draft protocol on dispute prevention and resolution
11 September 2026

The European Court of Justice strikes against transparency again. Our response should be to call for an end to corporate limited liability
Report of the Fifth Session of negotiations on the UN tax convention
4 September 2026
Submission to Workstream I on Co-Lead’s Zero Draft of UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation (post-Fifth Session)
28 August 2026
Submission to Workstream II on Taxation of Income from Cross-Border Services (post-Fifth Session)
26 August 2026
Strengthening public resource mobilization through tax justice
25 August 2026
Submission to Workstream III on Dispute Prevention and Resolution (post-Fifth Session)
24 August 2026

From data to policy: Building Africa’s evidence ecosystem for better tax reform


Its remarkable that the US is also beginning to look into tax avoidance systems. Spread the ideas, also within europe. BUT: the US are actually the most important country for tax avoidance (especially in scale, but also in juristiction), so start in Delaware with the clean up!!
it’s about a lot more than delaware . . . http://www.financialsecrecyindex.com/PDF/USA.pdf
Comments are closed.