John Christensen ■ HSBC, money-laundering and Swiss regulatory deterrence
Number-crunching, à la Private Eye: the case of HSBC and its Swiss fine for “organisational deficiencies” in relation to money-laundering.
- $42.8 million Fine imposed on HSBC by Geneva authorities for “organisational deficiencies” related to money-laundering uncovered in #SwissLeaks
- More than $100 billion Amount held in accounts exposed in #SwissLeaks
- 0.04% Fine as a percentage of (revealed) assets under management
- 0.00% Likely deterrent effect
Not all the assets under management were laundered, of course. Far from it, we must hope. But the “organisational deficiencies” – including reassuring clients that no information would reach their home authorities, or using offshore accounts to circumvent disclosure requirements – represent risks that applied to the whole operation.
To put it another way, the fine is about a fifth of the £135 million in tax that HMRC recovered in the UK alone.
Even the prosecutor imposing the fine was embarrassed, and “launched a stinging attack” on the Swiss law that apparently prevented anything within yodeling distance of being a deterrent.
Cross-posted from Uncounted
Related articles
Another EU court case is weaponising human rights against transparency and tax justice
Submission to Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers on undue influence of economic actors on judicial systems
Litany of failure: new briefing sets out OECD’s manifold shortcomings in international tax talks
Financing Africa’s Climate Action
Tax injustices are eroding women’s rights in Brazil, and we need to talk about it
Submission to the Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
20 May 2024
The fiscal social contract and the human rights economy
29 April 2024
The secrecy enablers strike back: weaponising privacy against transparency
Privacy-Washing & Beneficial Ownership Transparency
26 March 2024