
The quote of the day, from an article entitled Germany’s Economic Mirage. It’s by Philippe Legrain, former adviser to the European Commission President:
“Policymakers should focus on boosting productivity, not “competitiveness,” with workers being paid their due.”
We have focused for a long time on this weasel word ‘competitiveness,’ mostly but not exclusively in the area of tax.
There is a fairly close analogy here between wages and tax, in the context of ‘competitiveness.’
As we have often noted, tax is not a cost to an economy, but a transfer within it. To argue otherwise is to fall for the fallacy of composition. The truth is that tax cuts in one area, http://pharmacy-no-rx.net/cialis_generic.html providing benefits to one sector at the expense of losses elsewhere, don’t automatically improve anything that one might call “competitiveness.” Read more on this here.
Similarly, wages are not a “cost” to an economy either, but a transfer within it: from a capital-rich corporate sector to their employees. Hence wage cuts don’t automatically make any economy more ‘competitive’ either.
In this word ‘competitiveness’ there is a whole realm of economic theory here, waiting to be properly explored.
Related articles

UN tax convention hub – updates & resources

New Tax Justice Network reports on real estate transparency
Beneficial Ownership of Real Estate Around the World
7 July 2026
Integrating the Collection, Use and Exchange of Real Estate Ownership Information
7 July 2026

Four definitions to change the world: Struggles over meaning in the UN tax convention negotiations

Fiscal hell or mirage? What Spain’s wage debate gets wrong

Introducing the Real Estate Secrecy Index

Indicator deep dive: Golden Visas

The European Court of Human Rights has upheld the weaponisation of privacy to restrict tax authorities’ access to banking data

She cleans your house but the tax system can’t see her

