
We have often commented on the fact that the OECD, a club of rich countries, dominates rule-making on international tax while its much broader (and more legitimate) counterpart (perhaps one might say ‘competitor’), the UN Tax Committee, has been left in the shade. Not only has the OECD (and its member states) ensured that the UN Tax Committee is under-resourced and under-supported; it has also sought to intervene powerfully in the UNTC’s decision-making processes to make sure it doesn’t deviate from the OECD’s jealously guarded “international consensus” on international tax.
They’ve just had a meeting in Geneva, which Martin Hearson has analysed here.
We’re going to highlight – perhaps a tad mischievously – one short paragraph from his report, as a teaser to invite you to read on.
“Unusually, the record of the discussion identifies the dissenters as the Chinese, Brazilian and Indian members of the committee. It is worth noting that none of these three individuals are still members of the committee.”
A key point being, perhaps, that international tax rules are increasingly being contested, as the rest of the (in parts somewhat technical) blog shows.
Beyond Hearson’s blog, we are hearing that the pressures from the OECD and certain member states remain high.
Related articles

UN tax convention hub – updates & resources

A heartfelt farewell to our dear Óscar

Public finance is feminist terrain

New Tax Justice Network reports on real estate transparency
Beneficial Ownership of Real Estate Around the World
7 July 2026
Integrating the Collection, Use and Exchange of Real Estate Ownership Information
7 July 2026

Four definitions to change the world: Struggles over meaning in the UN tax convention negotiations

Fiscal hell or mirage? What Spain’s wage debate gets wrong

Introducing the Real Estate Secrecy Index

Indicator deep dive: Golden Visas


truely said….totally agreed with your words
Comments are closed.