
Markus Meinzer ■ EU tax haven blacklist must not be watered down

We are reposting here an open letter sent by TJN-Germany today to Jean-Claude Juncker, President of the EU-Commission, on the forthcoming EU tax haven blacklist. It is worth noting too, that the OECD’s blacklist of June 2017 only had 1 (o-n-e!) tax haven listed: Trinidad & Tobago. All of which acts as a powerful reminder of why, at TJN, we do not hold our breath about blacklisting exercises as they have been failing for decades in delivering on their promise to curtail tax avoidance and evasion (as we have researched in some depth here and here).
You can read the full letter as a pdf here.
Dear President Juncker,
The German network of organisations aiming for tax justice (Netzwerk Steuergerechtigkeit) is very concerned that the tax haven blacklist announced by the European Union for the end of 2017 will leave out important secrecy and low-tax jurisdictions and will therefore not contribute to a solution of the problem addressed.
We became aware of the fact that jurisdictions like the Cayman Islands are lobbying heavily to not be included on the list. While every country/jurisdiction needs a fair check, it is important that the EU takes its own list seriously. The EU’s criteria must be applied thoroughly, including not accepting announcement from countries to get off the list. Instead, only real legal changes should count.
We would also welcome the EU observing a zero per cent tax rate not only as an indicator, but already as proof of a jurisdiction being non-cooperative or even harmful. The European Parliament has called for minimum tax rates in the European Union. A zero per cent tax rate should thus be a sufficient reason for being listed.
Unfortunately, however, we note that further blacklist criteria are too weak. Any result based on these criteria will only provide a misleading picture of the problems we still face.
Another major shortcoming is the fact that EU countries will by definition not be named on the blacklist, even though some have been clearly identified as harmful. The EU, at the very least, needs to strengthen its internal processes, e.g. in the Code of Conduct Group, to push for reforms in its own secrecy and low-tax jurisdictions, such as the Netherlands, Ireland, Cyprus, Malta and Luxembourg, and in all EU countries with harmful practices, such as the lack of capital income tax for non-residents.
Finally, we think that any blacklist must be accompanied by strong and immediate sanctions.
Yours sincerely,
Sarah Godar
(Coordinator, Netzwerk Steuergerechtigkeit)
***
Letter as PDF
Related articles

Urgent call to action: UN Member States must step up with financial contributions to advance the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation

Incorporate Gender-Transformative Provisions into the UN Tax Convention
Asset beneficial ownership – Enforcing wealth tax & other positive spillover effects
4 March 2025
The international tax consequences of President Trump
27 February 2025
Negotiating Tax at the United Nations: An introductory factsheet from an EU perspective
18 February 2025

Trump’s walkout fumble is a golden window to push ahead with a UN tax convention
Just Transition and Human Rights: Response to the call for input by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
13 January 2025

Tax Justice transformational moments of 2024

The Tax Justice Network’s most read pieces of 2024
